<em>You didn't provide a list of options, so let me just explain the difference between primary sources and secondary sources in studying history.</em>
Primary sources are things that come from persons directly involved in the events or lives being studied. So, let's say World War II is our subject. Any diary entries or letters (like the diary of Anne Frank or a letter by a soldier) would count as primary sources. So would any official proclamations or letters or government documents -- such as the Constitution of France or a declaration of war by US Congress.
Secondary sources are written by historians or others after their study of primary sources. A biography of Napoleon, or a historical article about one of America's founding fathers, or a textbook on world history -- all of those would be secondary sources.
Answer:
Definitely 2 and 5, but I’m not sure about the others.
Explanation:
The Battle of the Alamo made the Texans want revenge.
Answer:
He was resurrected three days later
In my opinion, the Constitution strike a balance of authority among the three branches of government mainly because there is a separation of powers. The legislative, judiciary, and executive branches are interconnected and they are dependent on each other. However, this does not mean that they can become enclosed in bias since many people are in power who all in all just represent the citizens of America.
