As a noun, a harangue is a long, aggressive speech.
As a verb, to harangue is to teach someone in an aggressive, unfriendly manner.
The answer that best fits this description is B. to give a pompous speech to.
Answer:
dont use a rhetorical question
Explanation:
i know a lot of people say to use rhetorical questions, but there's always going to be that one person who answers it because they don't know that it's rhetorical or the person that answers it to be funny. what i've found helps when writing how-to paper is to start it off like "if you've ever wondered how to (whatever your paper's about) then keep reading!"
hope this helps-
have a fun time writing
Answer:
The single set of factors that best explain their responses is *Life-cycle factors*
Explanation:
Life cycle are stages we pass through out our lifetime as humans.
The choices of individuals are always different based on their life-cycle factors, especially with children. Life cycle factors are factors for assessing individuals choices or alternatives based on their age and present state of mind.
Though 4-year-old Fernando is very happy as he is still in adolescence stage which makes the transition very easy for him, while 13-year-old Jorge is quite unhappy, considering her age, there is a tendency she might have a very difficult time adjusting to the move.
The factors which determines their decision are their life-cycle factors.
The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
