I think this is a true or false question
The above statement is true.
As we can see that there are always some sort of affinity among people some have highly positive towards some and negative towards others so they will try to group up with the ones they like but this would always lead to dissatisfaction of some people in group as they will feel unfair as they are not in group they wanted but in random assignment no one has control so even if they are unsatisfied they cant blame it on others. So there are lesser differences
The answer is<u> "The Society for Human Resource Management and HR Certification Institute".</u>
While investigating prerequisites for resource management jobs, it before long ends up obvious that HR confirmation is rapidly moving from being liked to being required. This is an indication that associations, regardless of whether in the for-benefit or non-benefit part, are seeing proficient accreditation with an expanding level of regard.
In fact, HR certification is currently observed as a central expansion to any HR expert's resume, especially as the present experts in human asset administration confront complex difficulties, for example, an absence of qualified ability and the globalization of business.
There are a number of nationally recognized human resources designations, including:
Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM)
The best example of how companies are upgrading themselves to meet changing customer preferences is personified in option (C) making online shopping services available.
Since customers nowadays prefer to shop online more often than not, many companies are now providing online marketplaces in combination with their traditional brick and mortar stores. Some companies do not even have a pop up store – they purely do their transactions online.
Answer:
The profit that they keep to reinvest in the business is recorded as D : retained earnings.
Explanation:
Retained earnings (RE) is the amount of net income left over for the business after it has paid out dividends to its shareholders.
Answer:
Economic integration agreement is when countries within a particular geographical area decide to remove or relax tariff or non-tariff barriers to trade between themselves and also to coordinate and harmonize their fiscal and economic policies. Free trade area is the simplest form of an economic integration; it is when governments of member countries agree to remove trade restriction between each other and when member countries are given the freedom to determine their own external trade policies towards non-members.
Supporters of free trade area argue that it is beneficial to the country based on the trade creation argument. Trade creation is where high-cost domestic production is replaced by more efficiently produced imports from within the group; that is, more expensive domestic products are replaced by lower priced imports from countries within the group. The trade creation argument is hinged on the fact that a free trade area ensures that trade is generated over and above what would otherwise have happened if there was no integration. Further, the removal of tariffs allows members to specialize in those products for which they have a comparative advantage leading to a variety of cheap imports for domestic consumers, thereby increasing living standards or welfare gains. Trade creation also creates an incentive for high cost domestic producers to cut cost so as to remain competitive thereby enhancing efficiency.
On the other hand, a free trade area is criticized on the basis of trade diversion. This is where trade with a low-cost country outside the group is influenced by higher–cost products supplied from within the group; this results in a less efficient allocation of resources as trade from outside the group is replaced by trade from within the group. Trade diversion could mean that local consumers would have to buy products at less competitive prices. Another argument would be that a free trade area would lead to a removal of tariff between member countries thereby resulting in a cessation of government revenue from tariffs. As opposed to a free trade area, free trade would increase world output and employment, raise quality and lower prices of goods as firms have access to factor inputs; it will also increase world living standards or enhances welfare gains. A free trade agreement only restricts these potential advantages to a particular geographical space.
Explanation:
