Answer:
$40
Explanation:
The computation of the premium pay for the next year is shown below:
= Estimated medical bills × given percentage for next year
= $4,000 × 1 %
= $40
By multiplying the estimated value of medical bills with the next year given percentage, the premium for the next year can come
All other information that is given in the question is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
The kettle falls five case illustrate a weakness of a
federal system in such a way that f<span>ederalism limits
political power and that it depends on compliance of state.</span>
<span>The federal system also aggravates the efficiency in awareness of Policies and its implementation.
The kettle falls five case was very surprising.</span>
Answer:
The answer is letter D.
Explanation:
Charities. It’s important to note that sometimes private solutions to externalities do not work. For example, this occurs when one party repeatedly holds out for a better deal. This describes the problem of (transaction cost, breakdown in bargaining, property held in common)
Answer:
The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
This statement is false, since the residual theory of dividends argues that these are irrelevant, that is, that the value of the company is not affected by its dividend policy. The main drivers of this theory are Modigliani and Miller. Both authors affirm that the value of the company is determined solely by the profitability and the degree of risk of its assets (investments), and that the way in which the organization divides its income between dividends and reinvestment does not have a direct effect on its value .
However, some studies show that significant changes in dividends affect the price of shares in the same direction, that is, increases in dividends translate into increases in stock prices, and vice versa. In response, M and M propose that the positive effects of dividend increases be attributed, not to the dividend itself, but to the informational content of dividends with respect to future income. Thus, any increase in dividends would cause investors to raise the price of the shares, while a decrease would cause a corresponding decrease in the price of the shares.
The amount that should be debited to Bad Debts Expense, assuming 3% of outstanding accounts receivable at the end of the current year are estimated to be uncollectible is $1,913
<h3>What is bad debts expenses?</h3>
Bad debt are debts owned to a business which cannot be recovered. Here, the customer has chosen not to pay this amount.
Computation of amount to be debited to Bad Debts Expense:
= Accounts Receivable, debit balance of $97,800 * 3% of outstanding accounts receivable at the end of the current year
= $97,800 * 3%
= $2,934
Then,
= $2,934 - $1,021
= $1,913
Hence, the amount that should be debited to Bad Debts Expense, assuming 3% of outstanding accounts receivable at the end of the current year are estimated to be uncollectible is $1,913
Learn more about bad debts expenses here : brainly.com/question/18568784
