Answer:
The Bullwhip Effect
Explanation:
Bullwhip effect is a phenomenon that occurs in an organisation's channel of distribution due to swings or erratic demands for products by customers. This erratic nature of demands will usually lead to forecasting inefficiencies especially in meeting the demands through the supply chain.
A sudden increase in demand could lead to production planning problems because there might not be enough inventory of materials on ground to meet the demand. Also, a sudden decrease in demand can bring the challenge of excess inventory of materials which may not be needed for production for a while.
One of the measures taken to manage this erratic nature of demands is to ensure that whatever the forecasts for demands is, safety stock must be included to the forecast level of demand so as to ensure that production planning is adequate and the demands are met as well.
While network evening newscasts have stayed fairly constant throughout the years, the news programs that Americans watch on local television stations and national cable channels have altered substantially in recent years.
<h3>What change has been noticed?</h3>
Local television newscasts have recently emphasized traffic, weather, and sports, even more, aired less edited package stories, and cut the lengths of stories—trends that might be a result of the industry's current economic challenges.
There is a growing fear that local TV news may be suffering some of the financial difficulties that have already hammered the newspaper sector as younger people are tuning out local newscasts.
Learn more about local television, from:
brainly.com/question/5418404
#SPJ1
Answer:
Fixed costs= $300,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Selling price per unit= $20
Variable expenses= $14
Break-even point in units= 50,000
<u>To calculate the fixed costs, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Break-even point in units= fixed costs/ contribution margin per unit
50,000= fixed costs / (20 - 14)
50,000*6= fixed costs
Fixed costs= $300,000
Answer:
(b.) Isabel will have a judgment entered in her favor
Explanation:
Under the Rules of the court Josh's action is referred to as Default of Appearance. Isabel is the Complainant while Josh is the Defendant.
It is the law that where a Defendant fails to appear before the court where there is a proof of service of the summons on him or her, Complainant may apply to the Judge for a judgement in respect of the claim on the summons to be entered in his or her favor against the Defendant.
Therefore, in the instance case at hand, Isabel will have a judgment entered in her favor for failure of Josh to appear before the court.
Option (a) is not the answer because Isabel does not need to file an amended complaint because Isabel did not ask the court for any amendment of her complaint. Isabel can only file an amended complaint if she intends to change her complaint against Josh.
Option (c) is not also the answer because Josh chooses to ignore the summons served on him. If for instance Josh did not get the summons served on him or the judge is of the opinion that Josh was not properly served, then the court can order that Josh must be served with a second summons.
Option (d) is also not the answer because Josh cannot have a judgment entered in his favor because he is the person who defaulted appearance before the court. A party who is in default of appearance cannot have judgment entered in his favor.
Answer:
Avoidable costs= $60,000
Explanation:
Giving the following formula:
Raw materials 50,000
Direct labor 10,000
Facility-level costs allocated to products 30,000
<u>We were not provided with information regarding the fixed allocated costs. If none of the fixed allocated costs are avoidable, only the variable cost will not be incurred if the product is eliminated.</u>
Avoidable costs= $60,000
