One reason the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 angered Northerners was that it required all citizens to support the slave system.
Further Explanation:
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was part of the Compromise of 1850. The Compromise of 1850 was one of many pieces of legislation that tried to solve the issue of slavery within the US.
The Fugitive Slave Act was put in place to benefit Southern slave owners. The goal of this law was to ensure the successful return of runaway slaves to their slave owners in the South. This law made it so that Northerners were legally obligated to return these slaves to their owners in the South.
Many different Northerners disliked this idea, as they did not agree with the institution of slavery. Some Northerners were considered abolitionist, meaning they wanted to get rid of the institution of slavery completely. This forced many Northerners to go against their own beliefs. Along with this, some Northerners ignored the law completely causing increased tensions between the North and South.
Learn More:
Compromise of 1850 Information- brainly.com/question/8165267
Key Details:
Topic: American History, Civil War
Grade Level: 7-12
Keywords: Civil War, Causes of the Civil War, Fugitive Slave Act, Abolitionist
Tea. The plant is grown and the leave plucked off it. Leaves dry then are crushed. Crushed leaves put in bag then soaked in hot water.
Amazing English ^
B. Artists from Italy focused on capturing the ideal form, while artists from northern Europe focused on capturing details.
Answer:
In ancient India, the Vaishyas were responsible for exporting goods to other countries.
The Vaishyas were people belonging to the lower caste.
They were treated badly and were considered as untouchables in the Hindu society.
These Vaishyas did all the odd jobs and were not allowed to enter religious places such as temples. Or to attend gatherings or sit with higher caste people.
* Hopefully this helps:) Mark me the brainliest :)!!
<em>∫∞ 234483279c20∞∫</em>
Regarding the clash of cultures between traditionalism (the old) and modernism (the new) there is no specific winner, but what happens is the transformation of society according to the new parameters that have been incorporated throughout history.
<h3>Examples of clash of cultures</h3>
Therefore, it is correct to say that the clash of cultures is still occurring today. As some examples for this fact, we can base ourselves on the technological revolution, which made globalization and the digital revolution possible.
With globalization, multicultural environments also emerged, where each culture is able to influence the other and coexist peacefully.
There is also the digitization of work, social interaction and the speed of information flow made possible by the creation of the internet, which makes older people need to adapt to these new realities in order to fit into new social dynamics.
Find out more information about globalization here:
brainly.com/question/1133228
