1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rama09 [41]
3 years ago
9

In a democratic government, there are no limits to individual freedom. True or False

History
2 answers:
CaHeK987 [17]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is true because people have the right of speech
MrRa [10]3 years ago
3 0
The answer is true, hope this helps

You might be interested in
Why did Germany pass the Nuremberg Laws under Adolf Hilters leadership
jeyben [28]

Answer:

Two distinct laws passed in Nazi Germany in September 1935 are known collectively as the Nuremberg Laws: the Reich Citizenship Law and the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor. These laws embodied many of the racial theories underpinning Nazi ideology. They would provide the legal framework for the systematic persecution of Jews in Germany.

Adolf Hitler announced the Nuremberg Laws on September 15, 1935. Germany’s parliament (the Reichstag), then made up entirely of Nazi representatives, passed the laws. Antisemitism was of central importance to the Nazi Party, so Hitler had called parliament into a special session at the annual Nazi Party rally in Nuremberg, Germany. The Nazis had long sought a legal definition that identified Jews not by religious affiliation but according to racial antisemitism. Jews in Germany were not easy to identify by sight. Many had given up traditional practices and appearances and had integrated into the mainstream of society. Some no longer practiced Judaism and had even begun celebrating Christian holidays, especially Christmas, with their non-Jewish neighbors. Many more had married Christians or converted to Christianity.

According to the Reich Citizenship Law and many ancillary decrees on its implementation, only people of “German or kindred blood” could be citizens of Germany. A supplementary decree published on November 14, the day the law went into force, defined who was and was not a Jew. The Nazis rejected the traditional view of Jews as members of a religious or cultural community. They claimed instead that Jews were a race defined by birth and by blood.

Despite the persistent claims of Nazi ideology, there was no scientifically valid basis to define Jews as a race. Nazi legislators looked therefore to family genealogy to define race. People with three or more grandparents born into the Jewish religious community were Jews by law. Grandparents born into a Jewish religious community were considered “racially” Jewish. Their “racial” status passed to their children and grandchildren. Under the law, Jews in Germany were not citizens but “subjects" of the state.

This legal definition of a Jew in Germany covered tens of thousands of people who did not think of themselves as Jews or who had neither religious nor cultural ties to the Jewish community. For example, it defined people who had converted to Christianity from Judaism as Jews. It also defined as Jews people born to parents or grandparents who had converted to Christianity. The law stripped them all of their German citizenship and deprived them of basic rights.

To further complicate the definitions, there were also people living in Germany who were defined under the Nuremberg Laws as neither German nor Jew, that is, people having only one or two grandparents born into the Jewish religious community. These “mixed-raced” individuals were known as Mischlinge. They enjoyed the same rights as “racial” Germans, but these rights were continuously curtailed through subsequent legislation.

5 0
3 years ago
How did farm families get things they needed, such as cloth, in the mid-1800's
zzz [600]

They either made it them selves out of cloth or anything they could find or they would go to local supplie store using there horses and wagon.

4 0
3 years ago
What will be the next civil rights fight?
Sladkaya [172]

The fight of disenfranchised or marginalized groups to regain their civil rights is generally referred to as a “civil rights struggle.” The use of the term is instructive as it indicates that although rights of citizenship, “inalienable rights,” are granted, for many they have to be wrested from society.

6 0
3 years ago
What was the industrial revolution?
blsea [12.9K]

Answer:

The Industrial Revolution, now also known as the First Industrial Revolution, was the transition to new manufacturing processes in Europe and the United States, in the period from about 1760 to sometime between 1820 and 1840.

Explanation:

Hopes this helps! (:

8 0
4 years ago
How many times has the Constitution been amended​
Softa [21]

Answer:

27 times

Explanation:

the first ten are called the bill of rights

hope this helps :)

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Examine this illustration titled “Revised.” It was created in 1917, during a period in which woman in the United States were fig
    7·1 answer
  • What was the name of the over 3000 American volunteers who violated the Neutrality Act of 1936 to fight in the Spanish Civil War
    10·1 answer
  • The united states followed a policy of expansionism in the late 1800s because
    10·1 answer
  • What did romans invent that we use today?
    15·1 answer
  • What dose the original u.s. constitution say about defining reminder citizenship
    6·1 answer
  • who was known for putting herself in the line of fire when taking pitchers what is her atchual nameof water to the colonial army
    14·1 answer
  • How did Lincoln make his cabinet members feel like they'd been heard, even when he didn't take their advice?
    13·1 answer
  • Why is the sky blue?????????????????????
    5·2 answers
  • 5. In general, noblewomen in the Middle Ages were expected to: *
    9·1 answer
  • The sugar act did which of the following
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!