Answer:
The judiciary is regarded as the nation's moral conscience in democracy. People anticipate that an independent judiciary should tell truth the people about the political power instead of being influenced by it. The political history of Nepal shows centralisation of power, first in the hands of Rana rulers, and then the Shah kings. The political changes of 1990 led to the substantial reform in the judicial system. The Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal, 1990, for the first time, guaranteed the independence of the judiciary.
Truth in Lending Act is the federal law that requires the cost of credit be disclosed to consumers in bold print on loan agreement
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
The Truth in Lending Act (TILA) passed in 1968 to take care whether the consumers are treated fairly by revealing about the true cost of credit. The credit documents should be made very clear to the consumers. It does not place limitations on banks about how enough interest they may impose or whether they must give a loan.
This TILA statement includes annual percentage rate, schedule of payment and finance charges and the repayment within loan lifetime. Regulation Z is alternative name for Truth in Lending Act. Both the terms can be used in all aspects of lending and credit card purposes.
Answer:
1. The author uses the words "undefined", "unbounded" and "immense" to describe the powers of the constitution.
2. Upset: it makes the Congress even more powerful than it’s previous long list of expressed powers
3. A Bill of Rights is necessary to protect the rights of citizens. The proposed Constitution does not do enough.
4. Yes he does, and it matters because if you don’t trust the people in power you wouldn’t have a real nation.
5.He seems more like an Anti-Federalist.
Part Two
1. Unnecessary and dangerous
2. From the Federalist No.84
3. No because he believes that its unnecessary and not needed in the constitution.
4. That the bill of rights is pointless and not realistic for the American people.
5 He is defiantly Anti-Federalist; He goes against everything Federalism is for.