1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
4 years ago
8

A. describe what was the relationship between charlemagne and the pope like?

History
1 answer:
Marizza181 [45]4 years ago
6 0
<span>A. describe what was the relationship between Charlemagne and the pope like?

The relationship </span>between Charlemagne and the pope was not at conflicted, as the French king understood the role of church and the pope in the realms, and so he promoted and actively get involved with reforms that would result in more power for the church. Moreover, he was coronated by the pope, and by doing so he recognized the pope's authority above his own.<span>

b. contrast how did the opinions of popes like Gregory vii about power differ from those of kings like Henry iv?

The main conflict between these point of view was on the role of the church as an authority for secular purposes. Some would believe that the foundation of power came from God, so the church had to be involved in the process of government and choice of new kings, while others believed that the right to govern was a matter of power passed generation by generation, from father to son, excluding the church in the process

c. evaluate do you think conflict with kings strengthened or weakened medieval popes?

I think that </span>conflict with kings gradually weakened medieval popes, as in the begin the conflict was very contained, where at the end of the middle age the conflict was influencing in a big way the politics and the stability of Europe, so in time this conflict weakened medieval popes.<span>

why? 

Because it undermined the authority of the church and promoted the idea that secular and religious power were two different things, while the church was much anchored on the idea the two forms of power were the same and so it was under the church choice who would have to govern, while with this conflict the church only had to approve, but had no more active role. 

a. identify what was the main goal of the crusades?

at the begin, the crusades were used as a tool to send knights that were around Europe causing various problems, but in time they become a way to take back the sacred places where Christianity was born,  while they were under the control of non-christian people. The goal was to reclaim authority and power over those territories. 

b. draw conclusions why do you think the crusades changed the relationships between Christians and other groups?

Before the crusades, the relationship between Christians and other groups were simple and positive, while the conflict had brought inside hostility, suspicion and a general loss of trust between the various group. Moreover, after the crusades, Christianity become more careful of what it was perceived as different. 

c. evaluate which crusade do you think was most successful?

The first one. It was a surprise and the goal of the conflict was mostly achieved: many of the crusades after this were taken in order to reclaim territories conquered during this time. The crusade was also very successful as it brought a new prospect of the economy in Europe and contribute in a significant way to the wealth of the region.

which was least successful?

The third one. The goal was not achieved, Saladin was a superb commander that achieved everything he wanted, moreover, the loss of life on both sides was terrible and since the third one, it is possible to argue that the conflict was substantially win by the other groups.  Only the battle of Hattin was enough to declare this crusade a lost cause.</span>
You might be interested in
What were two weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation?
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

Each state had one vote, and the government did not have an executive branch.

Explanation:

I took the test and the lesson, hope this helps!!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Bakit naging isang mandirigmang polis ang spart
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

Ang layunin ng mga batas ay upang sanayin ang mga mamamayan na maging matigas na sundalo upang labanan nila ang mga potensyal na kaaway o pag-aalsa ng mga alipin. Ang resulta ay isang matibay na pamumuhay na hindi katulad ng anumang nakikita sa Greece noong panahong iyon. Ang debosyon ng mga Spartan sa pagbuo ng isang estadong militar ay nag-iwan ng kaunting oras para sa sining o panitikan.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Ai giúp mình với
Ket [755]

djdhududjdjh

\\  \\  \\  \\  \\  \\  \\  \\  \\  \\  \\

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Examples of positive and negative effects of military regime
Daniel [21]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

examples of positive and negative effects of the military regime

The positives are that a military regime is so discipline and strict enough to make people focus and work under heavy scrutiny and supervision to accomplish goals. Many times this is the only path to start to do more and better things, with discipline, perseverance, and order. That is exactly why strict disciplined, without flexibility, is referred to as military discipline. Let's have in mind that soldiers have no room for flexibility, thinking, or feedback. Soldiers simply follow orders and directions.

For instance, General Douglass McArthur's military regime after World War in Japan, trying to help Japan to reconstruct after the two atomic bomb explosions. His military planning goals, plus the focused discipline of the Japanese, made Japan a modern superpower in just a few years.

On the other hand, the negatives. People are no soldiers and like to enjoy their liberties. Under a military regime, there are no liberties. The military is in full command. Many times, under this type of regime, liberties are suppressed or controlled. THis is the opposite of a democracy.

We can see many examples of military regimes in the Middle East and Africa. People have no liberties and many times tyrannic military dictators oppress the citizens.

5 0
3 years ago
19 points
e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The ten commandments were important to the development of modern democracy because they:
    10·2 answers
  • A leader of the Montgomery Bus Boycott who also became the spokesperson for nonviolent protest by African Americans was
    6·2 answers
  • 50 points**
    8·1 answer
  • ¿ Cuál cree usted que es el "arkhé" o "principio" del cosmos?
    8·1 answer
  • The major differences between the gulf coast plains and the piney woods
    11·1 answer
  • What was the meaning of fire for the early people early Christianity
    12·1 answer
  • Place the following events from the Revolution in chronological order
    6·1 answer
  • What is the meaning of the man in the areana speech
    9·1 answer
  • Which colony had the least slaves in 1640? About how many?
    12·1 answer
  • The Dawes Commission goal was to negotiate agreements with the leaders of the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek, and Seminole
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!