They are corresponding angles. Corresponding angles have equal measures.
Supplementary angles definition: They add up to 180°
There are several ways to prove a parallelogram:
1. Opposite sides theorem converse
2. Opposite angles theorem converse
3. Parallelogram diagonals theorem converse
4. Parallel congruent sides theorem
∠P + ∠Q = 180° --1
∠P + ∠S = 180° --2
1: ∠P = 180° - ∠Q
Sub 1 into 2:
180° - ∠Q + ∠S = 180°
180° + ∠S = 180° + ∠Q
∠S = ∠Q
Or you can try saying the opposite sides are parallel, since they are interior angles and those are straight lines
No, -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n is not equivalent to -30 - 13n
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us revise the operation of the negative and positive numbers
- (-) + (-) = (-)
- (-) × (-) = (+)
- (-) + (+) = the sign of greatest [(-) if the greatest is (-) or (+) if the greatest is (+)]
- (-) × (+) = (-)
- (-) - (+) = (-)
- (+) - (-) = (+)
∵ The expression is -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n
- Simplify it
∵ 2(3 + 2n) = 2(3) + 2(2n) = 6 + 4n
∴ -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n = -8 - (6 + 4n) + 7n
- Multiply the bracket by (-)
∴ -8 - (6 + 4n) + 7n = -8 - 6 - 4n + 7n
- Add the like terms
∴ -8 - (6 + 4n) + 7n = (-8 - 6) - 4n + 7n
∴ -8 - (6 + 4n) + 7n = -14 + 3n
∴ -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n is equivalent to -14 + 3n
∵ -14 + 3n ≠ -30 - 13n
∴ -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n is not equivalent to -30 - 13n
No, -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n is not equivalent to -30 - 13n
Learn more:
You can learn more about the directed numbers in brainly.com/question/10364988
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
m∠XYZ = 166
AB = 2√5
Modpoint (1 , 5)
Step-by-step explanation:
Look at the photo below for the details.
:)
