The reason that Britain did NOT colonize Malaysia and Burma was to prevent china from colonizing them instead.
<h3>
Why did the British and Burma separate from India?</h3>
British partitioned Burma from India in 1937 to weaken the Burmese nationalist movement. After World War II, under the leadership of U Aung San, this movement reached its pinnacle, and Burma gained independence on January 4, 1948.
<h3>
When did the British leave Burma?</h3>
In 1937 the British government separated Burma from India and granted it its constitution, independent of that of India; the masses interpreted this as proof that the British planned to exclude Burma from the next phase of Indian reform.
To learn more about the Burmese nationalist movement visit the link
brainly.com/question/9406614
#SPJ4
<span>The women suffragists worked to achieve voting rights by organizing; holding meetings and conventions; meeting with lawmakers; by registering to vote and voting; going on hunger strikes; holding parades, marches and public demonstrations; picketing government buildings; and by organizing petition campaigns.
</span>
Answer:
I absolutely agree with that statment of territorial losses being the worst punishment faced by Germans in Treaty of Versailles.
Explanation:
Territorial loss is a system where a country is stripped off its rightful lands and areas due to fallout with other countries after a war. After the end of world War 1, Germany lost the war. And, also, <em>they lost most of their territory due to the Treaty they signed with other countries.</em>
The Treaty was to curtail their power and influence in Europe. Despite the treaty being too harsh, what pained the Germans most was the territorial loss to some Allied powers such as Belgium, Cezchslovakia, Poland, East Pressua and renouncement of control of colonies under their care.<em> It is sighted by researchers, that, the territorial loss is part of the reason why German went to war during world War 2.</em>
Religious freedom is answer
