Answer:
Those who examine the impact of the Holocaust on politics deal with the extent, depth, type, and dynamics of the impact but not with the impact itself. The impact itself is considered axiomatic because it is so sweeping and vast. Since the issue is so large and made up of so many overt and covert associations - direct and indirect, Jewish and pan-human, immediate and belated, ethical and practical - a general framework that presents and diagnoses the matter becomes, by nature, a telegraphic prologue to innumerable studies already carried out and yet to come.
Explanation:
In document 2, the lack of evidence on Mexico's actions and the text aimed at the Mexican public affects the reliability of the document.
<h3>Why is reliability affected?</h3>
- Document 2 is written by a Mexican who only valued US stocks.
- The author wants to talk to a Mexican public and stimulate a feeling of revenge against the USA.
- For this reason, the author only addresses the negative actions provoked by the USA and how this has affected Mexico.
The author ignores Mexico's negative actions, placing the country as innocent in the approaching conflict.
More information about research sources at the link:
brainly.com/question/26044896
The answer is true. This because the colonies wanted to separate to become independent.
my feelings would be that it was a pleassure helping them
I'd say "<span>hydroelectric dams."
</span>