All categories

3 years ago

What is the value of z?

Mathematics

1 answer:

andreyandreev [35.5K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

122 degrees, because x and z are alternate interior angles

122 degrees, because 58 degrees and z are same side interiors which add to 180

Step-by-step explanation:

1) we know that

m∠x=m∠z -----> by alternate interior angles

m∠x+58°=180° ----> by supplementary angles (form a linear pair)

m∠x=180°-58°=22°

therefore

m∠z=22°

2) m∠z+58°=180° ----> by same side interior angles

solve for z

m∠z=180°-58°=122°

therefore

122 degrees, because x and z are alternate interior angles

122 degrees, because 58 degrees and z are same side interiors which add to 180

You might be interested in

What is the equation of the line passing through the points (Two-fifths, StartFraction 19 Over 20 EndFraction) and (one-third, S

Neporo4naja [7]

Answer:

y = one-half x + three-fourths

Step-by-step explanation:

The 2-point form of the equation of a line can be used for starters.

y = (y2 -y1)/(x2 -x1)(x -x1) +y1

y = (11/12 -19/20)/(1/3 -2/5)(x -2/5) +19/20 . . . . fill in given values

y = ((55 -57)/60)/((5 -6)/15)(x -8/20) +19/20 . . simplify a little

y = (-1/30)/(-2/30)(x -8/20) +19/20 . . . . . . . . . . and a little more ...

y = 1/2x -4/20 +19/20

y = 1/2x +15/20

y = 1/2x +3/4 . . . . line in slope-intercept form

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Write any three rational number between -3 and 0

ella [17]

Answer:

negative square root of 2

negative square root of 3

negative square root of 5

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Si el máximo común divisor (MCD) de 6432 y 132 disminuye en 8, entonces será igual a: * 1 punto 6 4 -2 -6

swat32

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Para empezar el maximo común divisor (MCD) de dos números se refiere al número en común que tienen ambos números, entre los cuales pueden ser divididos. En el caso del máximo se refiere al número más alto posible en que ambos números pueden ser divididos.

Para poder saber esto, es necesario anotar los factores en los cuales pueden ser divididos ambos números. Sin embargo, ya que son cantidades altas, puede tomar mucho tiempo determinar esto, por lo tanto nos vamos a la respuesta final.

Sabemos que el MCD de 132 y 6432 es disminuido en 8 unidades, es decir, se le resta 8 al MCD de esos números, y ese número debe coincidir con alguna de las opciones puesta ahí. Por lo tanto, lo que vamos a hacer para resolverlo rápidamente es sumarle 8 a cada una de las opciones y luego, verificaremos si el número obtenido es divisor de 132 y 6432.

Obtención del MCD original:

a) 6 + 8 = 14

b) 4 + 8 = 12

c) 2 + 8 = 6

d) 6 + 8 = 2

Con estos resultados, veamos cual de ellos es el MCD de 132 y 6432.

Para el 6432:

6432 / 2 = 3216

6432 / 6 = 1072

6432 / 12 = 536

6432 / 14 = 459,24

Podemos observar con estos resultados que el 14 queda descartado al tener un resultado decimal, por lo tanto debe ser 2, 6 o 12. Veamos la cuenta con el 132:

Para el 132:

132 / 2 = 66

132 / 6 = 22

132 / 12 = 11

Podemos observar ahora en este caso que el 132 es divisible entre 12, por lo tanto, es el MCD entre 132 y 6432, asi que se concluye que el resultado de disminuir por 8 el MCD de ambos números es:

Exitos

8 0

3 years ago

The diameter of cold virus cell is about 3x10-9 meter,and the diameter of a streptoccus bacterium cell is about 9x10-7 meter. Wh

Archy [21]

Here we need to compare the orders of magnitude of two measures.

We will see that the bacteria is 300 times larger than the virus.

We know that:

The diameter of the virus-cell is:

$D_v = 3 \cdot 10^{-9} m$

The diameter of the bacteria cell is:

$D_b = 9 \cdot 10^{-7} m$

So, to compare them, first notice that both are in the same units, meters, so we only need to compare the numbers.

Is common sense to identify the one with the largest exponent as the largest number, and the largest exponent is -7, thus the bacteria should be the larger one.

But let's prove this with math, remember the property:

$\frac{a^n}{a^m} = a^{n - m}$

Let's take the quotient between the diameters and see what we get, I will use the diameter of the bacteria in the numerator, thus if the quotient is larger than 1, it would mean that the bacteria is greater and by how much.

$quotient = \frac{ 9 \cdot 10^{-7} m}{ 3 \cdot 10^{-9} m} = \frac{9}{3} \cdot 10^{-7 + 9}\\\\= 3*10^2$

So we can say that the bacteria is 3*10^2 = 3*100 = 300 times larger than the virus.

If you want to learn more, you can read:

brainly.com/question/4953281

8 0

2 years ago

Use theorem 7. 4. 2 to evaluate the given laplace transform. do not evaluate the convolution integral before transforming. (writ

irga5000 [103]

With convolution theorem the equation is proved.

According to the statement

we have given that the equation and we have to evaluate with the convolution theorem.

Then for this purpose, we know that the

A convolution integral is an integral that expresses the amount of overlap of one function as it is shifted over another function.

And the given equation is solved with this given integral.

So, According to this theorem the equation becomes the

$\mathscr{L} \left( \int_{0}^{t} e^{-\tau} \cos \tau d \tau \right) = \frac{ \mathscr{L} (e^{-\tau} \cos \tau ) }{s} \\\mathscr{L} \left( \int_{0}^{t} e^{-\tau} \cos \tau d \tau \right) = \frac{\frac{s+1}{(s+1)^2+1}}{s} \\\mathscr{L} \left( \int_{0}^{t} e^{-\tau} \cos \tau d \tau \right) = \frac{1}{s}\left (\frac{s+1}{(s+1)^2+1} \right).$

Then after solving, it become and with theorem it says that the

$\mathscr{L} \left( \int_{0}^{t} f(\tau) d\tau \right) = \frac{\mathscr{L} ( f(\tau))}{s} .$

Hence by this way the given equation with convolution theorem is proved.

So, With convolution theorem the equation is proved.

Learn more about convolution theorem here

brainly.com/question/15409558

#SPJ4

3 0

2 years ago