1) When it comes to Shakespeare our truncated attention spans might make it difficult to understand the complex structure and language within his work.
2) A contemporary of Shakespeare's may have understood the language in his works because they lived at the same time as him.
3) Many readers like the phantasmagoric scenes in Shakespeare's plays because they are dreamlike or surreal.
4) We get a vicarious thrill out of reading fiction because it provides us with imagined interpretations.
Answer:
an indirect reference to a place, person or a event
Explanation:
<em> </em><em>allusion </em><em>is </em><em>an expression designed to call something to mind without mentioning it explicitly; an indirect or passing reference.</em>
#◌⑅⃝●♡⋆♡Nåmřāthā ♡⋆♡●⑅◌
I want to see "Catching Fire" because everyone else has already seen it.
It seems for Sanders that he should not feel guilty at all, because the men he had in his minds were not the same men as the daughters or other complaining women had in their minds of their father and other men, but he regrets not understanding these women complains at the time in the end of the text.
As in his childhood he grew with hard work men around him and women which would enjoy life in the house, caring for babies and going to supermarket he could not have the same view as the women that accused men of having privileged lives, because he could not even imagine the life of men, as bankers or architects, that were served by women and many times kept them in the house as in a prision, or abandoned them.
He is not a prosecutor as he closes the text saying “ I wasn't an enemy, in fact or in feeling. I was an ally ”.
True because ignoring relevant background issues will make your writing less persuasive.
