Answer:
The answer is "Option C".
Explanation:
The NAT accurately identifies the environment and internal interfaces, and main customers can link to a 192.168.1.50 Web server. When designed for, proxies examine input and output packages. IP nat "inside source" implies to encourage an outgoing parcel emanating from an "outside" application and behave accordingly.
Answer:
Following are the code to this question:
import math# import math module
def RaiseToPower(): # defining a function RaiseToPower
r= math.pow(2,1/12) # defining r variable that calcualte the decimal point value.
return r # return r variable value.
f0= float(input()) #defining f0 variable that hold input frequency .
for n in range(0,5):#defining for loop to count all frequency
fn = f * math.pow(RaiseToPower(),n) # defining fn variable that calls method RaiseToPower and multiply the value by frequency
print(fn,end=' ') # use print method to prints all five frequency
Output:
440
440.0 466.1637615180899 493.8833012561241 523.2511306011974 554.3652619537443
Explanation:
Description of the above python code can be defined as follows:
- In the above code first we import the package of the math module for converting frequency, after importing package a "RaiseToPower" method is declared, inside the method r variable is declared, that counts decimal value and return its value.
- In the next step, "f0" a frequency variable is declared that input a value from the user and defined a for loop to in the loop fn variable declared, calls the method and pass its input value and stores its decimal points and at the last print its value.
The lamp and the ice bag were at the same place.
Sounds like the experiment was intended to show on a small scale ocean currents from the poles to the equator and back to the poles. The bag of ice would simulate the cold at the poles while the lamp would simulate the heat provided by the sun near the equator. With that in mind, let's look at the possible flaws and see what is likely.
Not enough ink was added.
* If you can see the ink, then there's enough ink. So this isn't the correct choice.
Not enough water was taken.
* Possibility there wasn't enough volume of water to setup a current, but not too likely since the baking dish was filled. So let's look further.
The dish was too small for the experiment.
* Same as above. It might be this, but there's something more likely.
The lamp and the ice bag were at the same place.
* This sounds like a winner. In the real world, the poles are cold and the equator gets more sunlight. So there's a temperature gradient. In the described setup, both the heat sink (the bag of ice) and the heat source (the lamp) were at the same location.
