Writing both in slope intercept form:
Line 1:
2x + 2y = 4 Subtract 2x
2y = -2x + 4 Divide both sides by 2
y = -x + 2
Line 2:
y = -x + 5
The lines have the same slope, -1, and different y-intercepts.
They are parallel lines
Answer:
-2
Step-by-step explanation:
I think this was the question you were talking about.
Answer: OPTION C
Step-by-step explanation:
There are some transformations for a function f(x). Some of them are shown below:
1. If 
, the function is shifted up "k" units.
2. If 
, the function is shifted down "k" units.
3. If 
, the function is shifted left "k" units.
4. If 
, the function is shifted right "k" units.
In this case you know that the function "g" is the transformation of the function "f".
Observe that the function "f" intersects the y-axis at:
And the function "g" intersects the y-axis at:
Therefore, since both functions are 4 units apart, you can conclude that the function "f" was shifted down 4 units to get the function "g".
Then, the rule that shows that transformation is:
Answer:
False.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is false because when dividing an odd number by an odd number, it usually isn't divisible. In this case, 690,26<u>9</u>. Is an odd number, because the last number, 9, is odd, which makes the whole thing odd. So, odd divided by odd never turns out well. (By the way the answer is 76,696.5555556).
