Answer:
Book value per share: 48.88
Explanation:
The book value per share is the minimun value of the company equity.
Book value per share = (Total Equity - Preferd Equity) / Total shares outstanding
Book value per share = 2,200,000 / 45,000
Book value per share = 48.88
In the numerator, we do not deduct anything from equity because there are no preferred shares. In the dividend, the outstanding shares are 45,000, because 50,000 have been issued and 5,000 are held in treasury, despite being authorized to issue 100,000 shares.
C is correct.
As a result of a tariff, prices for domestic steel consumers go up so D is false. Option B is false because it does not make the market fair for everyone as now domestic producers can charge a higher price since foreign competition is being excluded. Since B, D are false it would make sense that A is also untrue as consumers are now suffering while it is the producers who benefit.
The kettle falls five case illustrate a weakness of a
federal system in such a way that f<span>ederalism limits
political power and that it depends on compliance of state.</span>
<span>The federal system also aggravates the efficiency in awareness of Policies and its implementation.
The kettle falls five case was very surprising.</span>
Answer:
D. The threat of takeovers tends to reduce potential conflicts between stockholders and managers.
Explanation:
As with the threat of takeover, there comes the risk of losing control, power, monetary benefits, the stockholder's tend to agree with managers, and the manager's tend to agree with stockholders.
As both aims for no takeover of the company, both work in for each other, agreeing to the suggestions placed.
There is no dis-regard to any of the suggestions paid by any of the party. This threat actually creates moral harmony and unity among stakeholders and management.
Therefore, correct answer is:
D. The threat of takeovers tends to reduce potential conflicts between stockholders and managers.
Answer:
The correct answer is Formal Benchmarking.
Explanation:
The English term "benchmark" comes from the words "bench" (bench, table) and "mark" (brand, sign). In the original meaning of English, the word compound could however be translated as a measure of quality. In other words, benchmarking is a way to determine how well a company performs, compared to others.
In order to be more competitive at present, it is necessary to use benchmarking since it provides strategies that allow identifying the best keys to the company's success, so that by implementing them the organization can be a leading and competitive company in a changing market and global in which business organizations currently have to see each other.
The majority of authors relate benchmarking with competitiveness and business improvement, being "the company" its natural scope. However, the potential benefits of its use make it considered in other areas, such as "public organizations", and at other levels, "sectoral" and "environment" (regional, national and international). This complicates the definition of the concept, since it is a tool that has multiple application possibilities, pursues different objectives in each case, and uses its own methodology in each area.
