Answer:
Explanation:
Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. Here the phrase “overall consequences” of an action means everything the action brings about, including the action itself. For example, if you think that the whole point of morality is (a) to spread happiness and relieve suffering, or (b) to create as much freedom as possible in the world, or (c) to promote the survival of our species, then you accept consequentialism. Although those three views disagree about which kinds of consequences matter, they agree that consequences are all that matters. So, they agree that consequentialism is true. The utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham is a well known example of consequentialism. By contrast, the deontological theories of John Locke and Immanuel Kant are nonconsequentialist.
Consequentialism is controversial. Various nonconsequentialist views are that morality is all about doing one’s duty, respecting rights, obeying nature, obeying God, obeying one’s own heart, actualizing one’s own potential, being reasonable, respecting all people, or not interfering with others—no matter the consequences.
This article describes different versions of consequentialism. It also sketches several of the most popular reasons to believe consequentialism, along with objections to those reasons, and several of the most popular reasons to disbelieve it, along with objections to those reasons.
What make you think that flowers will actually grow fast by hearing im curious to
Because that is the lower class.
I think you forgot to give the options along with your question. I am answering the question based on my research and knowledge. "laissez-faire economics" is the term that is used to describe the <span>belief that capitalism operates best with the least government regulation. I hope that the answer has helped you.</span>
The actions of the British that led to the War of 1812 were:
- restrictions on US trade
- forcing American sailors to join the British Navy
In the first decade of the 19th century, Britain was at war with France but both countries continued to trade with the U.S. and this led to tensions.
War eventually broke out between the British and the U.S. because:
- the British were blockading France and refusing to allow the Americans to trade with them
- the British were capturing American sailors and using them to man Royal Navy ships
- the U.S. wanted to expand into Canada and saw this as an excuse to do so
In conclusion, the War of 1812 would not have happened if the British were not restricting U.S. trade and forcing American sailors into the Royal Navy.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/20802332. </em>
