1. Protectorate is a relation between two states or countries wherein the weaker one is dependent on the strongest one that put it under protection. So the best definition that concides with the given description is <span>B. country with its own government but under the control of another outside power
2.</span> Sphere of Influence is a type of international relationships wherein one territory shares its culture, economic, military, or political exclusivity in order to satisfy needs of the ouside <span>powers of the state that put this territory under control. The best option is </span><span>E. Area in which an outside power claims exclusive investment rights
3. Direct rule is a system of a governmental rule in which </span><span> the central authority has power over the whole country. It means that all the provinces or states belong to central autrority and follows the same laws and rules as the other regions of a country. Also, every decision is made only by authoruty, not by people. As well as indirect system it was employed during imperialism so the most suitable definition - </span><span>C. Officials were sent to govern a colony from the ruling country
4. The point that makes</span> Indirect Rule different from Direct Rule is that this<span> system of governmental rule allows locals to take part in some decision devoted to the local (depending on area) laws. In this case authority has less power that people so the correct definition is </span><span>A. Local rulers stayed in power under European “guidance”
5. And c</span>oncession is a special economic rights given to a foreign power. Concession is usually made regarding to agreement between two countries that have common aims and want to achieve certain common goals. The correct answer is D.
Answer:
The answer is either A or C, but most likely it is A
Explanation:
Answer:
The declaration stated the primary reasoning behind South Carolina's declaring of secession from the U.S., which was described as "increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the Institution of Slavery".
Explanation:
HOPE THIS HELPS ;}
Think about which man would agree with
i think
Answer:
He was relevant in defending indigenous peoples in Latin America.
The defense assumes that they are free and in their freedom enjoy the natural right.
Explanation:
In the middle of the year 1502-1510 - Friar Bartolomeu de Las Casas leaves for America where he lands with twelve other friars. In this period, Spain is at the beginning of an empire of magnificence, as discussed above, the Arabs are being expelled by the Catholic kings.
Arriving in the land of the natives, the friar Las Casas is enchanted by the kind reception of the Indigenous, but little by little, Bartolomeu realizes the dark side of the Spaniards subsidized only by the greed of gold and silver or other means that could generate precious goods. In the midst of the shadows of greed, however, is a young man full of vitality and with a right intention to evangelize the natives.
The defense assumes that they are free and in their freedom enjoy natural law.
From his point of view, Las Casas would see exceptional indigenous docility as a way of showing human possibilities and qualities, moving from the wild to the civilized way, so evangelizing in the eyes of the religious would not be a process of domination but rather a means of domination. for liberation. In other words, the interplay between two cultures or between two peoples would bring the sum of vast and ennobling experiences to both sides. Therefore, the exchange of experiences would only be possible if there was a mutual adherence of respect, dialogue and otherness that would converge on justice.
