A. He insisted on neutrality until the United States was provoked by German actions.
Yes i’m sorry it is due tomorrow
Answer: While the Pope had granted Spain sovereignty over the New World, de Las Casas argued that the property rights and rights to their own labor still belonged to the native peoples. Natives were subjects of the Spanish crown, and to treat them as less than human violated the laws of God, nature, and Spain.
In a nutshell, the protective tariffs were responsible for the development of the economy in the north but had the opposite impact in the south where they had the opposite effect.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What action was an economic cause of increased tension between the north and south?</h3>
Generally, One of the economic factors that contributed to the escalating tensions between the North and the South was the protective tariff. In terms of its economy, the North had developed into an industrialized region and had a large number of enterprises. On the other hand, the South maintained a significant reliance on agricultural production.
To assist the Northern Industries, high protective tariffs were imposed on commodities imported from other countries. Because of this, additional goods had to be purchased from northern vendors.
The South was forced to pay a higher price for the items that they imported from Europe as a result of this tariff, which benefited the North but put a bigger burden on the South.
To summarize, the protective tariffs contributed to the expansion of the economy in the north while having the opposite effect in the south.
Read more about the economy
brainly.com/question/2421251
#SPJ1
CQ
Which of these measures contributed to an increase in the economic tensions that existed between the North and the South?
Dred Scott decision
Protective levies on imports
Bleeding Kansas
The election of Lincoln
