The Three-Fifths Compromise was a temporary solution to a long-term political issue.
<span>Though the United State Supreme court annulled the Georgian law that prohibited non native Americans to be present in cherokee territory (native American Land), the decisions was not enforced and had little impact at that time. The decision didn't carry order of enforcement and even president Andrew Jackson and Governor Glimer didn’t abide by the decision. Worcester felt that the decision is refused by the state itself and it didn't impact in protecting broad legal rights of the Indians. Within 3 years, the cherokee nation was forced west of Mississippi river on “Trials of Tears”.<span>
</span></span>
Answer:
Boycott- A Protest
Nonimportation agreement- a boycott which restricted importation of goods to Boston
Militia- Military force of civilians to help army in emergency’s
Minutemen- militiamen who volunteered to serve at minutes notice
Petition- formal written request appealing to authority with respect
Repeal- An action of revoking a law or congressional act
Hope this helps :D
Answer:
When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional issue, that judgment is virtually final; its decisions can be altered only by the rarely used procedure of constitutional amendment or by a new ruling of the Court. However, when the Court interprets a statute, new legislative action can be taken.
Explanation:
Answer:
the two examples
Explanation:
The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government.
The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.
