I am sort of confuse becouse this is phrased as one question (at first i thought you where talking about the recent fight about not putting in a pipeline but i relized you said why DID)
So i will split it into 2 Native americans fought for land becouse for one they needed a place to live and second they belived the great spirit wanted them to live where they did
They fought for water to live/drink
Sure, violent games can influence some kids, but taking away things that a child likes is like taking away their identity and what they like to do. Some might say, "Oh, they can find others," but it can't be assumed that whoever plays a violent game is going to become a killer. And why should the law ban enjoyment?
One Way organizations are trying to slow down global warming is A) Saving the Rain Forest.
Answer:
This requirement only applies when the law in question requires the government to have acted.
This state action requirement extends to a number of actions.
According to the Supreme Court in Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., Inc., 500 U.S. 614 (1991), "Although the conduct of private parties lies beyond the Constitution's scope in most instances, governmental authority may dominate an activity to such an extent that its participants must be deemed to act with the authority of the government and, as a result, be subject to constitutional constraints."
Explanation:
