Even though you forgot to provide your question with some options I have some ideas how to sort it out. So, if smart car is involved in a head on collision with an suv it means that this situation is an example of Newton's third law, when both forces are equal. I'm sure it will help you it some measure, but next time check it more careful.
Answer:
The answer is B. Cross-sectional
Explanation:
Cross-sectional research can define as a research that involves using different groups of people who differ in the variables of interest but share other characteristics. Cross-sectional research are studies which based on observations that take place in different groups at one time.
Cross-sectional study can be define as an observational research that analyze data of variables collected at one given point in time across a sample population.
Answer:
judicial activism
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario this decision is an example of judicial activism. This term refers to a court ruling that is suspected of having been made on the basis of a personal opinion as opposed to an actual existing law. Such as in this case since the court made a ruling on something that is not not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.
Answer:
The secessionists claimed that according to the Constitution every state had the right to leave the Union. Lincoln claimed that they did not have that right.
Explanation:
One of Lincoln's aims was to prevent the Border States from leaving the Union. He knew that if the Union undertook military action, it would be seen as the aggressor and as the initiator of a war between the states.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
many faced religious or political prosecution in their countries, and they fleed to the US to escape violence and war in their countries.
