Increased prosperity and a growing middle class.
Ok ok I can go skate with me and you get me a little something to do you want me some time I love
Answer:
Student: Sir, should we make a statistical assessment of the results of the project?
CS teacher: I believe so, but I would like to see the results first and read the summary of your project, to indicate the best evaluation.
Student: If it is not necessary, I believe that we can finalize the project. Perhaps we can present it at the university's next science and technology symposium.
CS teacher: Send me what you've done so far, so I can evaluate it better. In addition, I need you to review the delivery dates for articles from the university magazine, to see if we can publish an article for this project.
Student: I'll see that right now.
CS teacher: Thank you.
Explanation:
The dialogue above was made between a student and a CS teacher about the completion of a project. This dialogue involves the evaluation of results and the publication of possible articles, in addition to the presentation of the same.
The dialogue was done in a fast, direct and clear language, as it should be between students and teachers busy with projects and dates and other bureaucracies in the academic environment.
It was either the third statement or the last one that I would have chosen. I believe "we laughed at the dog with the shaggy fur who was catching the ball" would be the best, however.
Answer:
Cheating in the card game at the end of the novel presents the picture of corruption and evil in the political system. The pigs and the humans both were indulged in the same type of corruption and cheating in the card game. This exemplifies the strength of the political power. Whether it be a human or a pig, the nature of the politician changes with respect to that of the power. Mr. Pilkington and Napoleon entered a heated argument in which both of them tried to cheat in the similar way. This brings to the conclusion that both the pigs and the humans played the role of liars, manipulators and hypocrites when the question of politics and humanities were asked.
