Answer:
B. are primarily designed to protect bondholders
Explanation:
Protective covenants are designed primarily to protect bondholders from future actions of bond issuer. They are also part of a loan agreement that limits certain actions a company may take during the course of the loan to protect the person who lend the money interests. They provide extra protection for the investors. Creditors use it to protect their interests by restricting certain activities of the issuer that could endanger the creditor's interest.
Answer:
Attached are causes of arguments between or among parties
Mark my answer brainliest
Answer and Explanation:
As we know that
The assets, expenses contains debit balance while the liabilities, revenues and stockholder equity contains credit balance
So based on this, the classifications are as follows
Particulars Type of account Normal balance Debit or credit Reason
a. Land Asset debit debit resources on the owners hand
b. Cash Asset debit debit resources on the owners hand
c. Legal Expense = expense debit debit consumption of cost
d. Accounts Receivable Asset debit debit resources on the owners hand
e. Dividends = Equity debit debit distribution made to owners
g. Notes Payable = Liability credit credit obligation made to creditors
h. Common Stock = Equity credit credit investment done by the owners
Answer:
A. cost-plus regulation
Explanation:
When a local regulator calculates the average cost of production for the public water utility or any other service and allow an adjustment for the normal rate of profit the firm should expect to earn, and then set the price that consumers can be charged accordingly, this is known as cost-plus regulation.
It is usually carried out by the government.
Answer:
$50 billion
Explanation:
To find the change in aggregate expenditures, we need to find the change in consumption. For this, we will use the marginal propensity to consume formula:
MPC = ΔC/ΔY
Where:
MPC = Marginal propensity to consume
ΔC = Change in consumption
ΔY = Change in output (GDP)
We know that out MPC is 0.5, and our ΔY is $billion. We plug these amounts into the formula:
0.5 = ΔC / 100 billion
And we rearrange the equation to solve for ΔC
ΔC = $ 100 billion x 0.5
ΔC = $50 billion
So the change in consumption is $50 billion, which is also the change in aggregate expenditure.
