All categories

3 years ago

Difference between per behaviour and organisational behaviour

Business

1 answer:

malfutka [58]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Organiational behaviour looks at the individual behaviour, then moves to group behaviour, progressively to the organization behaviour, which you can also call the organization culture. It requires skills to understand how the organization and its members affect each other. Areas include frameworks for diagnosing and resolving problems in organizational settings. Human behaviour, call it individual behaviour is a sub-set of organization behaviour.

You might be interested in

Companies especially ones with multinational operations and/or newly acquired businesses, typically have

quester [9]

<span>Companies especially ones with multinational operations and/or newly acquired businesses, typically have multiple cultures rather than a single culture.

When a business is multinational, they operate in different countries and in each country they operate in they are dealing with different cultures. Because of this, they have different cultures within their organization and operate according to where they are doing business. Successful companies will adapt to each culture so that the business runs like any other business would in their country.
</span>

6 0

2 years ago

Which best explains what a credit score represents?

jeyben [28]

A credit score is a statistical number that depicts a person's creditworthiness. Lenders use a credit score to evaluate the probability that a person repays his debts. Companies generate a credit score for each person with a Social Security number using data from the person's previous credit history. A credit score is a three-digit number ranging from 300 to 850, with 850 as the highest score that a borrower can achieve. The higher the score, the more financially trustworthy a person is considered to be.

<span>

Read more: Credit Score Definition | Investopedia http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/credit_score.asp#ixzz4VeWYGsiy
Follow us: <span>Investopedia on Facebook</span></span>

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Your investment bank has an investment of $100 million in the stock of the Swiss Roll Corporation and a short position in the st

stealth61 [152]

Answer:

hello your question is incomplete below is the complete question and the missing table

Your investment bank has an investment of $100 million in the stock of the Swiss Roll Corporation and a short position in the stock of the Frankfurter Sausage Company. Here is the recent price history of the two stocks: on the evidence of these six months how large would your short position in Frankfurter sausage needed to be to hedge you as far as possible against movements in the price of swiss Roll

answer : $42003667

Explanation:

$100 million in stocks

According to the data provided in the table attached below, to short the Frankfurt in order to hedge investment in Rolls is calculated below

we have to calculate the total return on both Roll corporation and Frankfurter sausage

for f-sausage

∑ (1 + monthly returns ) / 100

= ( 1 - 0.1 + 1 - 0.1 .... + 1 + 0.1 ) = -0.0297 = -2.97%

for Roll corporation

∑ (1 + monthly returns ) / 100

= ( 1 - 0.1 + 1 - 0.05 .... + 1 + 0.1 ) = -0.012475 = - 1.24%

next we will calculate the total loss inquired when investing in Roll corporation

Total loss = percentage loss * total investment

= 0.012475 * $100 million = - $ 1247500

we will have to offset the loss by shorting investments in F sausage

hence : $1247500 = investment in sausage * total return

1247500 = investment in sausage * 0.0297 ( The total return of F sausage is positive because it was a short position )

hence short investment in F sausage to offset loss incurred in ROLLS INVESTMENT

= 1247500 / 0.0297 = $42003667

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is NOT a reason that a demand curve would shift?

V125BC [204]

Change in technology is not a reason for the demand curve to shift

3 0

2 years ago

During the mid-1980s, we observed a significant reduction in oil prices. In the United States, we would expect that this reducti

docker41 [41]

Answer:

<h2>A reduction in the oil prices in United States would lead to a a larger reduction in the GDP deflator than the CPI.Hence,the correct answer in this case is option D) or a larger reduction in the GDP deflator compared to the CPI.</h2>

Explanation:

In Macroeconomics GDP deflator and Consumer Price Index(CPI) both indicates the fluctuations or variations in the overall price level of all the goods and services in the economy.However,CPI only includes the prices of goods and services that are finally consumed or purchased by the consumers or buyers in the economy and excludes the goods and services involved in any commercial,business to business or government exchange or transaction.On the other hand,GDP deflator estimates the price level of all the goods and services produced by the economy.Therefore,GDP deflator is a relatively comprehensive and broader price indicator in the economy compared to the CPI and is inclusive of all types of commercial transactions between all entities,unlike CPI.Now,in this context,oil is used both for final consumption by consumers or buyers as well as for commercial purposes or intermediate good by firms and companies for production of final goods and services.In many common instances,oil is heavily traded in the international market and is a major export commodity for most of the oil producing countries.Therefore,CPI,in this case,would only register the reduction in price of oil that has been used only for final consumption by the consumers or buyers in the economy.In contrast,GDP deflator will account for the overall reduction in price of oil that is produced by US in general which is used for all commercial,government or administrative and final consumption.Consequently, oil price reduction in US will cause a relatively higher reduction in its GDP deflator than the CPI.

5 0

3 years ago