When an area of land will support the growth of healthy crops, we call
4) Fertile
“One of the strangest controversies in the history of Orientalism turned upon the “origin of bhakti”, as if devotion had at some given moment been a new idea and thenceforth a fashionable one. It would have been simpler to observe that the word bhakti means primarily a given share, and therefore also the devotion or love that all liberality presupposes; and so that inasmuch as one “gives God his share” (bhagam), i.e. sacrifces, one is his bhakta. Thus in the hymn, “If thou givest me my share” amounts to saying “If thou lovest me”. It has often been pointed out that the Sacrifice was thought of as a commerce between Gods and men: but not often realised that by introducing into traditional conceptions of trade notions derived from our own internecine commercial transactions, we have falsified our understanding of the original sense of such a commerce, which was actually more of the potlatsh type, a competition in giving, than like our competitions in taking.
<span>The Founding Fathers believed it was important to have a strong central government for various economic, political and military reasons so that the new states could function together as a single nation.</span>
It really depends on which era, if the question asks about the Roman Republic, then it would be a republican government. In Ancient Rome, an aristocracy was used. In the Roman Empire, the emperor was the main man, but he also had a senate.
Hope this helps...
Well the National military leaders were trying to take control of the imperial government.
