Answer: The correct answer is "TRUE".
Explanation: Real consequences—rewards and punishments that arise from using a tactic or not using it—should not only motivate a negotiator's present behavior, but also affect the negotiator's predisposition to use similar strategies in similar circumstances in the future. <u>is TRUE </u>because the consequences that emerge from each tactic not only influence the behavior of the negotiator in the present, but also in the future, these should serve as background to not make bad decisions again and to easily identify those that will bring rewards.
Answer:
Perishability
Explanation:
Perishability describes how business services cannot be stored. As we all know, we've defined services as offering of an intangible commodity for sale. This intangible commodity can neither be stored, saved, returned or resold after they've been used. Thus, perishability in terms of services refers to how businesses cannot be stored for sales in the future. In this case, hotels tend to charge less during other times of the year as they cannot store their services to be rendered only in the holiday times of the year.
Answer:
Quasi Contract:
In the case of Lindquist Ford, Inc. v. Middleton Motors, Inc., 557 F.3d 469 (7th Cir. 2009) the trial court settled money damages to Lindquist. The Court of Appeals reversed the result that the trial court had mismanaged the mutual law theories of quantum meruit and unjust augmentation and imprisoned for a new trial. The trial court settled damages to Lindquist and Miller for Miller's salary.
Explanation:
The necessities to improve on the quasi-contract theory are as follows:
- The party looking for damages discussed a benefit on the other party.
- That party also discussed the benefit with the sensible expectation of being paid.
- The party was not performing as a volunteer in providing this benefit.
- The party getting the benefit would be irrationally enriched if permitted to retain the benefit without disbursing for it.
All of these necessities must be encountered in order for a quasi-contract judgment to be awarded.
The necessities under unjust improvement are as follows:
- A benefit discussed upon the perpetrator by the plaintiff.
- Appreciation by the respondent of the fact of such benefit.
- Acceptance and retention by the respondent of the benefit, under conditions such that it would be discriminatory to retain the advantage without payment of the worth thereof.
Lindquist met the essentials required for unjust enhancement and the court fund in their favor.
The necessities under quantum merit are as follows:
- The complainant must prove that the respondent requested the plaintiff's services.
- It was reasonable for the applicant to expect reimbursement for the services. Lindquist met the elements compulsory for quantum meruit and the court found in their favor.
The condition most likely to be doubtful in this case is whether or not the party seeking compensations actually discussed a benefit upon the other party, or whether Lindquist essentially conferred a benefit upon Middleton through the management of Miller. The court resolute through indication presented that Lindquist and Miller had a reasonable anticipation to payment for services rendered and that Middleton received a benefit from Miller's services
Answer:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Vetty funny bro
Explanation:
Answer:
b. supply of dollars in the market for foreign-currency exchange shifts left
Explanation:
In the case when the expected return on the US assets should be rise while keeping other things constant so it reduced the dollar supply because the investors in US would begins switching the international investment to the domestic due to this it reduced the supply. This cause to shifting the supply curve to the left
Therefore the option b is correct
