Answer: As adults, these children might struggle to improve their standard of living.
Explanation:
Child labor is considered work carried out by minors before having the legal age to work. That is, <em>before the age of 18.
</em>
<em>
</em>
At the beginning of the industrial era, there were no rights for workers, who had extreme working conditions. In the absence of any regulation, it was common for factories to hire children to do the jobs with a lower payment than they paid an adult. Also, children were exposed to accidents, illnesses, or mutilations.
<em>Because of this, when children grew up, it was unlikely that their living conditions improved; usually these children died at a young age in extreme poverty</em>.
This situation did not help to have a healthy economy for the country since the quality of life of the inhabitants was not high.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
Excavating means digging a hole or channel
I hope I helped :)
<span>-He describes the extreme rituals that people hold in America which he introduces his topic, ritual activity, "the focus" of which is the human body, the appearance and health of which looms as a dominant concern in the ethos of the people.</span>
