1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sattari [20]
3 years ago
6

What important distinction did president john f. kennedy make regarding civil rights?

History
2 answers:
mrs_skeptik [129]3 years ago
7 0
He said that civil rights was a moral issue.
viva [34]3 years ago
7 0

Kennedy emphasized that civil rights was a matter of morality and ethics and that it was everyone's responsibility.

On the day of his assassination, John F. Kennedy was not in Texas by chance. In deciding to attend a political event there in 1963, he knew he needed to pay special attention to the state if he wanted to win re-election. The motive: the bill introduced that year against racial discrimination that would alienate virtually the entire South of the country to the Democratic Party, whose electoral base was there. And Kennedy foresaw that. He did not see his Civil Rights Act passed, which occurred with his successor, Lyndon Johnson, on July 2, 1964. However, the initiative put an end to various racial segregation systems in the United States and one of the president's main legacies, albeit at a very high price for the Democratic Party.

You might be interested in
Where the final battle for end of zemenemesafint e.adisalem​
max2010maxim [7]

Answer:

nd of Zemene Mesafint era (1850s) More importantly, with his triumph over Ras Ali II at the Battle of Ayshal, Kassa Hailu ended the Wara Sheh dynasty, and with imperial power once again in the hands of a single man, the Zemene Mesafint is considered to have ended and the history of Modern Ethiopia to have begun.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which river marked the northern boundary of Islamic expansion in central asia by 750 C.E.?
pogonyaev

The name of the river that marked the northern boundary of Islamic expansion in central Asia is Oxus. In 651, Arabs took Iran. After this, they went towards the Oxus river in the north with the intention of defeating the Turkish. The Arabs succeeded and the expansion setling Oxus river as the northern boundary was finally consolidated in 750 C.E.

4 0
3 years ago
support or refute the last rotation that the second two party system was created by those who supported Jackson versus those who
Otrada [13]

In order to support such contention, it is necessary to mention the exact historical origins of the Second Party system. In the first two decades of the 19th century, there were two main political parties: The Federalist Party and the Democratic-Republican Party. However, after 1816 the Federalist Party collapsed and for these elections the presidential race was not between parties but between candidates of the same party. In the 1824 presidential elections there were four presidential candidates (Henry Clay, William Crawford, Andrew Jackson, and John Quincy Adams). They were all Democratic Republicans. None of them obtained an Electoral College majority. Andrew Jackson was the candidate who had won the popular vote and had the most electoral votes of the four but did not have a full majority. Because of this it would have to be the House of Representatives that would chose the next president and Henry Clay, one of the candidates was its Speaker. He made a shady political deal with John Quincy Adams, he would elect Adams as new POTUS if Adams agreed to make him Secretary of State, which is exactly what occurred. Jackson was infuriated and vehemently denounced such political maneuverings. His followers were equally enraged and they all united to create a new Democratic party. Adams created his own National Republican Party but was ousted from the White House by Jackson’s Democratic Party in the 1828 elections. So it is quite safe to state that the Second Two Party System was created by those who supported Jackson versus those who opposed Jackson.

6 0
3 years ago
Why was the Articles of Confederation discarded?
professor190 [17]
C is correct. The founding fathers were afraid of making government too strong and risk becoming just like Britain so they deliberately made the government extremely weak. Unfortunately the government was so weak that they couldn't do important things like collect taxes or enforce laws.
8 0
3 years ago
This structure was created by
stellarik [79]

Answer: Possibly A or B

Explanation: i don't see a structure...

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who became involved in the civil war in Lebanon because the PLO was based there?
    12·1 answer
  • Why did social inequality intensify in europe during the industrial revolution?
    15·1 answer
  • To get the soviets to accept the deal, what did truman offer them and require of them?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the early colonists survive in their new land during the initial years?
    13·1 answer
  • Answer ASAP
    7·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    15·1 answer
  • did nations with strong central governments achieve more stability than those with less autocratic governments? Why or why not?
    13·2 answers
  • What was Mary Wollstonecraft idea
    6·1 answer
  • What is an initiative? <br> A. <br> B. <br> C.<br> D.
    15·1 answer
  • What did St. Patrick introduce to the irish?​
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!