European nations give away land to people willing to settle and work in their colonies, because they have to pay the people to live there, as many of their civilians didn't want to go, for there were no profit in going "Why would we go to an unkonwn place for no profit". The land allowed companies to send settlers there, as people went there to farm or get rich quickly
hope this helps
Answer: मुझे आपके प्रश्न का उत्तर नहीं पता है, लेकिन मुझे लगता है कि आप इसे देखने में सक्षम हो सकते हैं क्योंकि मेरा एक प्रश्न उससे मिलता-जुलता था और मैंने इसे देखा और इसने वास्तव में मेरे प्रश्न का उत्तर देने में मेरी मदद की, मुझे आशा है कि आपको अपना उत्तर मिल जाएगा और मैं आपकी कामना करता हूं अच्छी किस्मत
Explanation:
The political, economic, and military strength of the Union was much greater than that of the Confederacy. However, the war did last four years. The Confederacy proved itself resilient on many occasions. Throughout the war the tide constantly shifted, and with that so did the political, economic, and military strength of either side. Although each side had its share of military successes, in the end, the superior Northern economy, centralized government and overwhelming manpower would eventually lead to victory. In mid 1863, both the Union and the Confederacy could have won the war although; the Confederacy lacked the industry, or manpower to wage a long war with the Union.
The Union was far more industrialized than the South. The North possessed 80% of total U.S. industry. In addition, most Confederate industry was located in the Upper South-particularly in Virginia. The Confederacy lost a great deal of potential industry and manpower when West Virginia, Kentucky, Delaware, and Maryland joined the Union instead of the Confederacy. The loss of these states to the Union was as much a testament to shrewd northern politics (Maryland) as it was to opposition within the states (West Virginia). Confederate industry, especially with the loss of these states, was unable to compete with the Union.
In addition to the South's lack of industry, most capital was invested in slaves and land-both of these are non-liquid. The South's lack of a large supply of liquid capital made it difficult for Southerners to buy munitions for the war effort. As a result of the South's lack of liquid capital the North enjoyed a decided advantage..
Glad to help :)
-liyah❤
The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be "threatening to secede from the Union". <span>In the early 19th century, south Carolina protested what it believed to be a violation of its rights by </span>threatening to secede from the Union.
