You can see how this works by thinking through what's going on.
In the first year the population declines by 3%. So the population at the end of the first year is the starting population (1200) minus the decline: 1200 minus 3% of 1200. 3% of 1200 is the same as .03 * 1200. So the population at the end of the first year is 1200 - .03 * 1200. That can be written as 1200 * (1 - .03), or 1200 * 0.97
What about the second year? The population starts at 1200 * 0.97. It declines by 3% again. But 3% of what??? The decline is based on the population at the beginning of the year, NOT based no the original population. So the decline in the second year is 0.03 * (1200 * 0.97). And just as in the first year, the population at the end of the second year is the population at the beginning of the second year minus the decline in the second year. So that's 1200 * 0.97 - 0.03 * (1200 * 0.97), which is equal to 1200 * 0.97 (1 - 0.03) = 1200 * 0.97 * 0.97 = 1200 * 0.972.
So there's a pattern. If you worked out the third year, you'd see that the population ends up as 1200 * 0.973, and it would keep going like that.
So the population after x years is 1200 * 0.97x
in table data from a survey about the amount of time students spend doing homework each week. The students were either in college or in high school:High Low Q1 Q3 IQR Median Mean σ
College 50 5 7.5 15 7.5 11 13.8 6.4
<span>High School16 0 9.5 14.5 5 13 10.7 5.3 </span>Both spreads are best described with the standard deviation.
Answer:
g = 
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that g varies inversely as h³ then the equation relating them is
g = ← k is the constant of variation
27.98ft
You can get this by using the tangent formula. The answer exactly expressed is 60tan25.
