The cognitive stage that Cassandra is illustrating is the
Formal Operations stage, this focuses on having to use reasoning and logical
thinking in which the person made use of hypothetical or even theoretical in
which Cassandra uses as she thought of hypothetical arguments.
<u>Answer:</u>
The decision from any journalist that violates the ethics of journalism is "A reporter writes a story about his wife’s company without revealing their relationship" and "A magazine runs a series of articles speculating about a celebrity’s medical history".
Option: (c) and (d)
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Society of Professional Journalists is the organization that represents the entire journalists of United States and it sets the boundary line for the journalist’s activities.
- For any journalist who attempts to write about the company of his wife without any mentioned relationship of theirs, it would violate the law.
- Similarly, it is beyond the ethics to write the series of reports about the medical history of celebrity.
Answer:
Manifest content
Explanation:
A client tells his therapist about a dream of riding on a train with his boss. At the end of the journey, the boss gets off the train at a terminal. The content of this dream, as related by the client to the therapist, is what Freud called its manifest content . The manifest content of a dream is the actual literal content and storyline of the dream which include the sights, sounds, and storyline of the dream and it is usually contrasted with what is referred to as the hidden meaning of the dream for example A client tells his therapist about a dream of riding on a train with his boss. At the end of the journey, the boss gets off the train at a terminal. The content of this dream, as related by the client to the therapist, is what Freud called its manifest content.
Answer: The Free Exercise Clause accompanies the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Free exercise is the liberty of persons to reach, hold, practice and change beliefs freely according to the dictates of conscience. The Free Exercise Clause prohibits government interference with religious belief and, within limits, religious practice. To accept any creed or the practice of any form of worship can't be compelled by laws, because, as stated by the Supreme Court in Braunfeld v. Brown, the freedom to hold religious beliefs and opinions is absolute. Federal or state legislation can't therefore make it a crime to hold any religious belief or opinion due to the Free Exercise Clause. Legislation by the United States or any constituent state of the United States which forces anyone to embrace any religious belief or to say or believe anything in conflict with his religious tenets is also barred by the Free Exercise Clause.
