1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
EastWind [94]
3 years ago
11

According to our discussion in class, two reasons why capital may not flow to poor countries are that the poorer countries may:_

_____.a. have economies unlike those described by a Cobb–Douglas production function and not be subject to diminishing returns to capital. b. have already accumulated high levels of capital relative to labor and may already have access to advanced technologies. c. legally prevent the inflow of foreign capital and provide strong legal protection of private property. d. have inferior production capabilities (such as a low value of A in the production function) and not enforce property rights (so that investments in the poor countries might be expropriated by the governments there).
Business
1 answer:
Marizza181 [45]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

have inferior production capabilities (such as a low value of A in the production function) and not enforce property rights (so that investments in the poor countries might be expropriated by the governments there).

Explanation:

According to our discussion in class, two reasons why capital may not flow to poor countries are that the poorer countries may: have inferior production capabilities (such as a low value of A in the production function) and not enforce property rights (so that investments in the poor countries might be expropriated by the governments there).

Poor countries have lower levels of capital per worker and this explains, in part, the reason for their poverty. Although the expected return on investment might be high in many developing countries, it does not flow there because of the high level of uncertainty associated with those expected returns. and lack of enforcement of property rights

You might be interested in
4-8 A manufacturing firm spends $350,000 annually for a required safety inspection program. A new monitoring technology would el
hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

$3,436,351.59

Explanation:

The computation of the amount that could be afforded to spend is shown below:

= Amount × (P/A, 8%, 20 years)

= $350,000 × 9.8181

= $3,436,351.59

We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come

And, the same is relevant too

7 0
3 years ago
The nations of Pamland and Lillytonia can produce two goods, DVD
vampirchik [111]

Answer:

The best deal would be option B) that is

Lillytonia sells 1/4 bushels of wheat to Pam land and gets 1 DVD player in return.

Explanation:

STEP 1

The output of DVD per unit of labor for Pamland = 150.

The output of Bushels of wheat per unit of labor for Pamland= 300.

The output of DVD per unit of labor for Lillytonia = 200.

The output of Bushels of wheat per unit of labor for Lillytonia= 600.

STEP 2

To calculate the comparative advantage, we use the following formula:

Comparative Advantage = DVD Output / Wheat Output

STEP 3

In Pamland, the opportunity cost, or the comparative advantage, of DVD is

300 / 150 = 2 bushels of wheat.

The opportunity cost of wheat in Pamland is 120/ 300 = 0.5 DVDs.

In Lillytonia the opportunity cost, or comparative advantage, of DVD is 600/200 = 3 bushels of wheat, while

The opportunity cost of wheat in Lillytonia is 200/600 = 1/3 or 0.33333 DVDs

STEP 4

As is clear from the calculations, Pamland should produce more wheat because it has the lower opportunity cost during production 2 against 3 for Lillytonia. Conversly, Lillytonia has the lowest opportunity cost for the production of DVD clocking 1/3 against a higher 1/2 for Pamland.

The countries should therefore trade in such a way that Pamlan is selling it's Wheat while Lillytonia is selling it's DVDs.

STEP 5

Given that Pamland's 2 bushels of wheat will cost it 0.5 DVDs, 4 bushels will thus cost it 1 DVD. It is impracticable (in any case) to have 1/2 of a DVD player.

Cheers

7 0
3 years ago
Alicia and Kwame are conducting customer surveys to gather information for a report. This is an example of ______ research.
artcher [175]

Answer:

Primary

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
True or False.The type of powder used to dust prints will vary depending upon the weather conditions when the print is lifted.
solniwko [45]
False because the powder is always the same cause it would probably just get confusing for the investigators to figure out which powder they need to use 
3 0
3 years ago
Olivia bought a $1,874 sprinkler system with her credit card. Her credit card has an APR of 10.31%, compounded monthly. She made
Radda [10]

Answer:

Percentage of the total lifetime cost of the system that the original price made up = 59.07%

Explanation:

The monthly payments for the sprinkler system can be calculated using the formula for calculating the present value of an ordinary annuity as follows:

PV = P * ((1 - (1 / (1 + r))^n) / r) …………………………………. (1)

Where;

PV = Present value or original price of the sprinkler = $1,874

P = Monthly payment = ?

r = Monthly interest rate = APR / 12 = 10.31% / 12 = 0.1031 / 12 = 0.00859166666666667

n = number of months = number of years of payment * 12 = 4 * 12 = 48

Substitute the values into equation (1) and solve P, we have:

$1,874 = P * ((1 - (1 / (1 + 0.00859166666666667))^48) / 0.00859166666666667)

$1,874 = P * 39.1976732321759

P = $1,874 / 39.1976732321759

P = $47.81

Therefore, we have:

Total payment for the sprinkler = Monthly payments * Number of months = P * n = $47.81 * 48 = $2,294.88

Total cost in water = Cost in water per week * Number of weeks in a year * Number of years that Olivia kept the sprinkler system = $2.11 * 52 * 8 = $877.76

Total lifetime cost of the system = Total payment for the sprinkler + Total cost in water = $2,294.88 + $877.76 = $3,172.64

Percentage of the total lifetime cost of the system that the original price made up = (Original price of the sprinkler / Total lifetime cost of the system) * 100 = ($1,874 / $3,172.64) * 100 = 59.07%

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • On February 2, 2019, Alexandra purchases a personal computer. The computer cost $1,800. Alexandra uses the computer 85 percent o
    10·1 answer
  • Please help with this exam WILL GIVE (BRAINLIEST)
    13·2 answers
  • What economies are driven by supply and demand?
    9·1 answer
  • Laskowski Company manufactures a part for its production cycle. The annual costs per unit for 5,000 units of the part are as fol
    5·1 answer
  • Hannah posts her résumé on the websites of several companies. Unfortunately, it is poorly formatted and contains several spellin
    6·1 answer
  • Morris Company self-insures its workers compensation loss exposure. The risk manager of Morris Company is concerned about the po
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these is a characteristic of a pure command economy?
    10·1 answer
  • The GoT cups are a fast seller and you need to ensure that you have enough rolls of paper to fulfill demand. The first stage in
    5·2 answers
  • The likelihood that a decision maker will ever receive a payoff precisely equal to the EMV when making any one decision is: a. L
    8·1 answer
  • How much money did he save by paying
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!