1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Murljashka [212]
3 years ago
6

Give at least three examples of how evidence may be destroyed by onlookers at a crime scene.

Social Studies
1 answer:
Nonamiya [84]3 years ago
4 0

Three examples of how evidence may be destroyed by onlookers at a crime scene are these:

<span>
1) Onlookers may walk through the crime scene that may destroy the footprints of the criminal or the victim.

2) Onlookers may enter the crime scene and touch some item which will result in destroying the fingerprints found there.

<span>3) Onlookers may touch, take, move around or change an object from the crime scene contaminating / destroying any fibers or hair which may come handy during investigation.</span></span>

You might be interested in
How did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 lead to the Trail of Tears? What impact did that have on the Cherokee nation?
densk [106]

Answer: The Indian Removal act of 1830 lead to the trail of tears because the tribes of Indians were in a way forced to give there land away and they had to move I believe out west. And the impact on the Cherokee Nation was that they had to split up and families were split and they had to leave the land that they were born and raised on.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What is the primary objective for a service or retail organization when making a location​ decision? A. Minimize cost B. Maximiz
kolbaska11 [484]

The correct answer is letter B

Explanation:  In this sense, the best answer is the letter B, because when looking for a new space for production and for the company, the most normal is to increase the workforce, as it is a way to increase the company's earnings so that this new place can get paid.

3 0
4 years ago
An informant may __________ without posing the threat of being unreliable. a. participate in a crime b. entrap people c. have a
Vlad1618 [11]

The correct answer is letter B

The informant is under no obligation to speak the truth, and the person is allowed to lie in his testimony.

Thus, the first difference is that the witness has an obligation to speak the truth. The informant does not have this duty.

The second difference is observed at the time of the judge to analyze the evidence obtained during the process.

6 0
4 years ago
Please do quickly, means a lot if you can answer
krek1111 [17]

Answer:

I will leave answer in explanation

Explanation:

1) Explain what it is like to be a citizen in an autocracy

An autocracy is a government where one person controls all power within a government such as North Korea. Since, an autocracy is a form of dictatorship, they are commonly more strict and enforce a singular belief of one person such as Adolf Hitler. As a result, there is no debate or arguments and if Adolf Hitler didnt want jews, then all german jew citizens lost citzenship and were abused. Thus, it can be very harmful for certain citizens based on views of an autocracy. During nazi times those who however comply with an autocracy can often have benefits but regardless all autocracies seem strict imo

2) Compare and contrast a dictatorship and absolute monarchy

A key similarity between a monarchy and a dictatorship is that both of these types of government have one single head of state .  In a monarchy, the head of state is a king or queen, but, in a dictatorship, the head of state can be any person. Howecer, A dictatorship is an office that has been gotten through force, and a monarchy or crown is reign that is passed from one generation to another.

3) Think of an example of how it could be possible for an autocracy to be a good form of governemnt

Well, if a single person can decide the countries future and has power that results in fewer disputes within governments and mean decisions can be turned into actions quicker. However, the autocracy power holder should be open minded  and accept new ideas rather than for personal fame, money and inherited power.

Since different people disagree it can be hard to form ideas and stuff within society, However, when only one person decides there is a bigger chance he would accept and thus move the nation forward . Its often very risky but people with enough political and logical understandings could benefit a country depending on its current situation

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following could not be found on George H.W. Bush's political resume?
ioda
<span>Which of the following could not be found on George H.W. Bush's political resume?
</span>
<span>United States Senate </span>
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • I need help please!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • The philosophy that life has no universal meaning and that individuals create their own meaning is called
    15·1 answer
  • When you are filling out a handwritten application for a scholarship, use _____ ink
    8·2 answers
  • How does latifundia relate to Rome?
    8·1 answer
  • In a single experiment, amount of reward and type of reward are varied. Subjects are randomly assigned to one of three "amount o
    15·1 answer
  • The average worker has _______ jobs during his or her career years.
    12·1 answer
  • 1.) Which of the following might be described as a recreational activity?
    7·2 answers
  • How does the fact that he is preaching in an era of mass political democracy affect Finney’s language?
    7·1 answer
  • What happens to a nation’s economy when they export more than they import and use economic terms please:)
    9·1 answer
  • You are working with a 9 year old child (Marty) who has become quite disruptive and destructive. This child tends to antagonize
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!