Answer:
protection profiles.
Explanation:
Common Criteria can be defined as an international set of guidelines and specifications which are designed and developed for the evaluation of an information security product, in order to ensure that they meet an agreed-upon and specific security standard for general use by the public. It comprises of two (2) key components: Evaluation assurance level and protection profiles.
In the Common Criteria, the common set of functional and assurance requirements for a category of vendor products deployed in a particular type of environment are known as protection profiles.
Answer:
The correct answer is: False.
Explanation:
On the one hand, the <em>"Crackers</em>" is the name that the people with a huge knowledge in cyber security and therefore that they are the ones that mainly focus on explore methods to breach defenses from computers in order to explote the weakness of the computer system so they will be able to have control of the system.
On the other hand, what Heidi discovered is most likely to be a <em>cybervirus</em> that those web pages implanted in their sites in order to breach the system of the person automatically without her knowledge or autorization with the main purpose of just destroying the computer system.
Answer:
-0.4242
Explanation:
Ra = 0.21 or 21%
Rf = 0.045 or 4.5%
Rp = 0.28 or 28%
Expected return on a portfolio is weighted average return of its assets
:
Rp = Rf*(1-w) + Ra*w
28 = 4.5*(1-w) + 21*w
28 = 4.5 - 4.5w + 21w
28 - 4.5 = 21w - 4.5w
21w - 4.5w = 28 - 4.5
16.5w = 23.5
w = 23.5/16.5
w = 1.4242
Hence, weight of risky asset = 1.4242
So, Weight of risk free asset = 1 - 1.4242
Weight of risk free asset = -0.4242
Explanation:
This is a complex issue that may reflect on the organizational culture of that company. As a leader, it is necessary to understand the situation and listen to both parties in order to find a favorable solution for the company and the employees. Since Marshall's work is important to the company, firing him at first may not be a favorable decision, what the leader can do is provide feedback to him about his interpersonal relationship at the company.
As an effective leader, it is necessary to constantly monitor the work and the relationship between employees, in which case it is necessary to understand the reason for Marshall's behavior and try to change the parameters and procedures that may be facilitating this behavior. It is necessary for him to understand that despite being an effective worker, the company is an integrated system that must be in perfect synchronicity for it to be successful in the market.
What the leader could do in this case then is to try to change the code of organizational ethics, seek training and psychological assistance for Marshall if necessary, talk to the workers who are part of the conflict to understand the situation in the best way, to seek a work redesign. , etc.
Answer:
fgoooo
Explanation:
fhgfh can you give me mola
