Answer:
The correct option is option D, that is A set of buyers sharing the common needs or characteristics that the company decides to serve.
Explanation:
The concept of target market is termed as the group of potential customers to whom a company wants to sell its products and services. This group also includes specific customers to whom a company directs its marketing efforts.
Thus
Option A is not correct as it is not the market target, it is the process of market segmentations.
Option B is not correct as it is a the market coverage strategy which targets several segments of the market.
Option C is not correct as it is a method of effective marketing.
So only option D is correct.
Answer:
Explanation:
Variance analysis studies the relationship between actual and budgeted cost for business activities. Variance analysis helps the management in two ways;
Favorable - if the actual cost incurred is less than the budgeted cost, the difference amount is a saving for the company.
Unfavorable - if the actual cost is more than the budgeted cost, the difference is an extra expenditure for the company.
Flexible budget;
- The flexible budget is prepared at different levels of volume that was initially projected by the master budget.
- It is highly styled and more useful than the master budget.
The report showing the Activity and Spending Variances for march is given in the file attached below, in other not to cause confusion. Thank you.
Answer:
Joint ownership
Explanation:
In a joint ownership, when a partner dies, his interest is passed on to the surviving partners.
This case scenario is a joint ownership
Answer:
Explanation:
United States is producing 200 tons of hamburgers and 60 tons of tacos.
United States' opportunity cost for producing 1 ton of hamburgers
= ![\frac{60}{200}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B60%7D%7B200%7D)
= 0.3
United States' opportunity cost for producing 60 tons of tacos.
= ![\frac{200}{60}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B200%7D%7B60%7D)
= 3.33
So we see that US has a lower opportunity cost in producing hamburgers, so it has a comparative advantage in producing hamburgers.
Mexico is producing 40 tons of hamburgers and 50 tons of tacos.
Mexico's opportunity cost of producing a ton of hamburgers
= ![\frac{50}{40}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B50%7D%7B40%7D)
= 1.25
Mexico's opportunity cost of producing a ton of tacos
= ![\frac{40}{50}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B40%7D%7B50%7D)
= 0.8
So we see that Mexico has a lower opportunity cost in producing tacos, so it has a comparative advantage in making tacos.
Since US specializes in making hamburgers, it will produce 200 tons of hamburgers and 0 tons of tacos.
Mexico specializes in making tacos, it will produce 50 tons of tacos and 0 tons of hamburgers.
Answer:
$380
Explanation:
Ziva's total cost of farming is composed of two different costs: explicit and implicit costs.
Explicit cost is an out-of-pocket cost that a person incurs to carry out a particular business activity. It is sort of, a business-related expense for which the business pays. In Ziva's case, it is $130, the cost of the seeds
Implicit costs are opportunity costs. An opportunity cost refers the benefits an individual, investor or business misses out on when opting for one alternative in preference of another. In our case, it amounts to $250($25*10 hours)
Thus, Ziva's cost of farming
= $130 +( $25*10) = $130 +$250 = $380