Answer:
The sample observations are not a randomsample, so a test about a population proportion using the normal approximating method cannot be used.
Step-by-step explanation:
The necessary conditions are
The sample must be random and independently selected from the normally distributed population.
n*p and n*q both must be greater than 5
There must be two outcomes "success" and "failure"
The number of trials must be fixed.
From the given information 2), 3)and 4) conditions are satisfied, but not 1) because we are not given that people are selected randomly.
Answer: The sample observations are not a randomsample, so a test about a population proportion using the normal approximating method cannot be used.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>No Solutions</u>
There will be no solutions when the left side is inconsistent with the right side:
2x +5 +2x +3x = 7x +1
7x +5 = 7x +1 . . . . . . no value of x will make this true
__
<u>One Solution</u>
There will be one solution when the left side and right side are not inconsistent and not the same.
2x +5 +2x +3x = 6x +1
7x +5 = 6x +1
x = -4 . . . . . . . . add -6x-5 to both sides
__
<u>Infinitely Many Solutions</u>
There will be an infinite number of solutions when the equation is true for any value of x. This will be the case when the left side and right side are identical.
2x +5 +2x +3x = 7x +5
7x +5 = 7x +5 . . . . . true for all values of x
_____
<em>Comment on these solutions</em>
You have not provided the contents of any of the drop-down menus, so we cannot say for certain what the answers should be--except in the case of "infinitely many solutions." For "no solutions", the coefficient of x must be 7 and the constant must not be 5. For "one solution" the coefficient of x cannot be 7, and the constant can be anything.
Answer:
-6 + 9x
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x = 43
Step-by-step explanation:
3x - 31 = 2(x+6)
3x - 31 = 2x+ 12
x =43
They are inverses.
The easiest way to solve this is to take the g(x) equation and switch the g(x) with the x. Then solve for your new g(x). Since it looks just like f(x) after doing that, it is an inverse.
