1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
4vir4ik [10]
3 years ago
12

Had congress allowed six more justices onto the Supreme Court how might have this changed the balance of powers

History
2 answers:
Gnoma [55]3 years ago
6 0
Yes, but the court has given unconstitutional rulings which was proposed by former US President Franklin Roosevelt and called it Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 to add more justices
Art [367]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Had Congress allowed six more justices onto the Supreme Court this might have this changed the balance of powers in a more strong and powerful Supre Court.

Franklin D. Roosevelt needed more support to pass his "New Deal" program. Roosevelt needed more judges for the approval of his program. So the legislative initiative that President Roosevelt proposed was called the "court-packing plan," to increase the number of justices in the Supreme Court. The formally known as the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 consisted of granting the President power to appoint up to six justices to the Supreme Court for every member of the court who had 70 years-old.

You might be interested in
Which type of organization has been important to China’s economic development?
GrogVix [38]
Sole proprietorshipsmultinational corporationsinternational aid organizations<span>opposition political parties

I dont 100% know but my guess is B.

</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the meaning of democracy shift from the colonial era to the revolutionary era
Readme [11.4K]
From the 1820s through the 1850s American governmental issues moved toward becoming in one sense more just, in another more prohibitive, and, by and large, more divided and all the more adequately controlled by national gatherings. Since the 1790s, legislative issues turned out to be more majority rule as one state after another finished property capabilities for voting. Legislative issues turned out to be more prohibitive as one state after another formally rejected African Americans from the suffrage. By 1840, every white man could vote in everything except three states (Rhode Island, Virginia, and Louisiana), while African Americans were prohibited from voting in everything except five states and ladies were disfranchised all over the place. In the meantime, political pioneers in a few states started to restore the two-party strife that had been the standard amid the political battles between the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans (1793– 1815). Gatherings and gathering struggle wound up plainly national with Andrew Jackson's crusade for the administration in 1828 and have remained so from that point forward. Gatherings named possibility for each elective post from fence watcher to president and battled valiantly to get them chose.
4 0
3 years ago
What statement about the Russian civil war is true please hurry
Serhud [2]

Answer:

the correct answer is B

Explanation:

Russia was the first nation ruled by Communists

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did independent oil producers in Texas do when the government ordered them to limit production? Why did they choose to this
WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

They didn't care about what the government say. Because of this, they would sneak at night to turn off the wells. This also helped a lot. Why?, because they didn't want to upset their families.

Explanation:

I took the test

3 0
3 years ago
According to Article 3, explain both sides of Shays' Rebellion. Include perspectives of the political leaders and the leaders of
Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

Explanation: The Shays insurgents claimed they were fighting for liberty as they did in the Revolution while the governor and other political leaders saw it as tyranny. The political leaders saw this as a threat to government and to the security of life and liberty. Additionally, there were former veterans fighting on both sides. Thomas Jefferson, while away in France, thought that "a little rebellion now and then is a good thing". He thought it was necessary for the health of the government. (Actual answer)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Is it important to trade with other countries?should we trade with countries who we do not get along with?
    9·1 answer
  • Help with this text please
    11·1 answer
  • How many drifferent position in the federal goverment require senate confirmation
    14·1 answer
  • What solved the problem of ties in presidential elections?
    6·1 answer
  • During the 1930s, worldwide prices for _____ fell due to overproduction in East Texas
    5·2 answers
  • Explain the significance of the Supreme Court’s ruling in the case Engel v. Vitale
    7·2 answers
  • Write a hook to get readers interested on :: Why should kids not be allowed to vote?​
    7·1 answer
  • Which detail from ""The Future of Money"" supports the opinion that digital currency is safer than traditional currency?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes a long term effect of industrialization
    15·1 answer
  • County government have not always been very efficient.<br><br> True<br> False
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!