1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mekhanik [1.2K]
3 years ago
9

What is considered Ronald Reagan’s most positive legacy

History
2 answers:
ki77a [65]3 years ago
7 0
Hm I believe it was how he handled the Cold War
Crank3 years ago
5 0
The answer is
Reagonomics
You might be interested in
Did Montesquieu think a good way to make laws is for all the people to directly vote on them
Aleonysh [2.5K]
In general, no, Montesquieu did not think a good way to make laws is for all the people to directly vote on them, since he thought a more efficient way was to have a Republic, in which people elect representatives. <span />
6 0
3 years ago
Which of following events was not part of the Compromise of 1850?
shusha [124]

The correct answer is A) Slavery would be abolished in Washington DC.

The Compromise of 1850 was a critical law, as it helped to prevent the Civil War from starting in the 1850's. Due to America's expansion into the west and the newly gained territory after the Mexican American War, Northern and Southern politicians were arguing constantly over whether or not slavery will exist in these new territories.

To make both sides satisfied, Henry Clay helped to develop the Compromise of 1850.This included California becoming a free state, New Mexico and Utah using popular sovereignty to determine whether or not slavery would exist, and the slave trade would be outlawed in Washington DC.  However, this law said nothing about the actual institution of slavery in DC.

6 0
3 years ago
Explain the rational as to why people created government
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Explanation:

Problem Solving

Identifying Basic Rights

Think of a right you believe all people should have. For example, you probably agree that everyone in the United States has the right to be protected from robbers and burglars. The belief that everyone should have this protection is shared by most people in the United States. We hear about it on television, in the newspaper, and in discussions.

Individually or in small groups, explain how you think rights like the one you have identified can be protected.

Defining "Natural Rights"

Most people in the American colonies believed that everyone had a right to life, liberty, and property. These rights were called natural rights. (Sometimes these are now called basic rights or fundamental rights.) The idea of natural rights means that all persons have these rights just because they are human beings. Everyone is born with these rights and they should not be taken away without a person's agreement.

Many of the Founders believed people receive these rights from God. Others believed that people have them just because it is natural for people to have them.

John Locke was a famous English philosopher. He lived from 1632 to 1704. He had written a book called Two Treatises of Civil Government (1690). In that book he wrote about natural rights. He said that the main purpose of government should be to protect the people's natural rights. He also said that kings should not have absolute power, that is, power without limits. They should not be able to deprive people of their natural rights.

Many Americans had read Locke's book, and they agreed with what it said about government. Those who had not actually read Locke's book knew his ideas from newspapers, political pamphlets, church sermons, and discussions.

Protecting Natural Rights

Although people agreed on certain natural rights, they worried about how those rights could be protected. Locke and others thought about what life would be like in a situation where there was no government and no laws. They called this situation a state of nature. They were afraid that in a state of nature their rights would be taken away.

Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules.

Problem Solving

It's your turn to think like a philosopher

Imagine what life might be like in a state of nature. Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules. Think what might happen if the teacher didn't have the right to tell anyone what to do.

Work together in groups of about five to answer the following questions about such a situation. Then choose a person to explain your answers to the rest of the class. Then compare your answers with John Locke's which follow.

What might be the advantages and disadvantages of living in a state of nature?

What might happen to people's rights?

What might life be like for everyone?

Compare Your List with John Locke's

You may have seen the same disadvantages in a state of nature that John Locke saw. Locke believed:

The stronger and smarter people might try to take away other people's lives, liberty, or property.

Weaker people might band together and take away the rights of the stronger and smarter people.

People would be unprotected and insecure.

The Social Compact

John Locke and other philosophers developed a solution to the problems that exist in a place without government. In a state of nature, people might feel free to do anything they want to do. However, their rights would not be protected and they would feel insecure.

Locke argued that people should agree with one another to give up some of their freedom in exchange for protection and security. They should consent to follow some laws in exchange for the protection that these laws would give them. This agreement is called a social compact or social contract. A social compact is an agreement people make among themselves to create a government to rule them and protect their natural rights. In this agreement the people consent to obey the laws created by that government.

In a later lesson, you will study the Declaration of Independence. You will see how the Founders included all of the ideas you have studied in this lesson in the Declaration.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does it mean to “centralize power”? How does it increase the power of an absolute monarch? Name one example.
Volgvan
T<span>o “centralize power” means to concentrate the power in one part of the government. It increases the </span><span>power of an absolute monarch because it takes away the power from the people and the monarch gets all the authority. 

</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What’s the difference between a cold war and a hot war?
just olya [345]

Answer:

answer is a

Explanation:

hope it help u

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If a voter does not move or change party affiliations, his or her registration lasts for life. Please select the best answer fro
    10·2 answers
  • What are some things Thomas Jefferson did to encourage farming?
    6·1 answer
  • When the Nile flooded, what did it leave behind?
    13·2 answers
  • The benefits of education, training, and choosing careers for workers
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the French establish settlements along the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence?
    12·1 answer
  • Why are regressive taxes considered heaviest on low income taxpayers?
    14·2 answers
  • Which one is a secondary source about the Civil war gettysnurg address, union soldiers letters, movie about gettysburg address
    8·1 answer
  • The act that banned segregation in public places was
    7·1 answer
  • Of the different types of federal taxes, which is the largest source of federal revenue?
    11·1 answer
  • 1. TRUE or FALSE? The Russian Revolution started because such things as: lack of weapons produced, supplies and munitions very r
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!