There was a prejudice among the black and white people in the United States during the 20th century. Blacks were segregated from whites and racial discrimination was rampant until Martin Luther King Jr. stood up for the rights of the black people. The government is trying their best to be fair between blacks and whites.
These are the correct answers...
Question 1- civic responsibility Question 2- make and amend laws Question 3- Localities in Georgia can add a certain percentage of sales tax to their own needQuestion 4- the Supreme Court Question 5- the superior court Question 6- General purpose provide different services special purpose provide specific servicesQuestion 7- The legal guardian should be contacted Question 8- filing a civil lawsuitQuestion 9- they all fall under the super vision of the executive branchQuestion 10- Regional Library
Answer:
The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.
According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.
The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.
The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time
Explanation:
Answer:
There are a few general factors that prompted the insurgencies in the late eighteenth century. In the first place, the Enlightenment theory desalinized the authority of the government and the congregation, advancing a general public dependent on reason rather than conventions. Next, the rise of a powerful dealers, which tried to political correspondence with other social classes. What's more, new tax collection excited the majority against monarchical force. Also, commonplace congregations turned into a significant popularity based territory where impervious to regal changes was voiced and sorted out. At last, the deregulation of business sectors brought about more significant expenses in essential items, for example, grain. The progressions met up to create social orders that were ready for upset.
Explanation:
hope this helps :) !!
