Because back then, rights were not equal to both genders. Women were the housewives, took care of the children, house, elders etc. Men were 'more important' or more valued then women.
Historians like original source documents: after action combat reports filled out by unit commanders, ration requests, orders for weapons and other such documents. However, you must keep the time period in which these documents were created. What could be valid in one time period in history where 1 weapon ordered was the same as 1 person in the ranks while in other times 500 items could be ordered but they went to both field personnel and into stock in various places but only 50 actual soldiers in the field ever got them. Sometimes these equipment and food ration records give accurate records of personnel before and after an engagement.
This is not designed to be an exhaustive inclusive list of all wars. Record keeping of figures is good from the 1200s onward for European nations. Prior to that valid records are spotty. Roman era records as well as Greek records in some cases can be verified. Most have to be calculated estimates within valid realms of probability. Some Chinese record keeping go back a lot further are also good. Modern Chinese records are hard to establish due to the many changes of governments that have occurred in China over the past 150 years. Records for other locations on Terra Firma is almost nonexistent prior to a European arrival.
Civilian casualty figures for most wars are impossible to verify. Most historians and governments guessed at them. Some guess due in part that the records of the people living in an area were themselves destroyed, and sometimes they were never counted to hide the true losses from their own people as to the number killed as well as to keep those numbers from enemy.
Answer:
United States should remain neutral
<span>The efforts of the temperance movement eventually led to passage of the 18th Amendment to the US Constitution, since this prohibited the sale and consumption of alcohol. </span>
Internment camps were affirmed as legal.
<u>Explanation:</u>
President Franklin Roosevelt ordered an executive (9066) order to the US army to ban the American Citizens who have Japanese ancestry. More than 10,000 citizens were moved to the internment camps that were specially designed for the Japanese ancestry American citizens.
Against this order, Fred Korematsu who is an American with Japanese ancestry refused to move to the camp from his home. He was considered to be convicted for not obeying the president's order. After so many hearing in the district and high courts, finally, his case appealed in the supreme court in 1944.
A 6-3 out of 9 rulings by different judges on the court the majority held back his conviction. Also, they mentioned in the ruling that it is legal to cut down the civil rights immediately when is a racial group is considered to be the suspect.