1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nana76 [90]
3 years ago
9

Does the amount of hazardous material absorbed by the bodies of hazardous waste workers depend on gender? The level of lead in t

he blood was determined for a sample of men and a sample of women who dispose of hazardous waste as a full time job. You want to test the hypotheses that the amount absorbed by men is greater than the amount absorbed by women. After performing a hypothesis test for two independent samples, you see a p-value of 0.0032. Of the following, which is the appropriate conclusion?
1)The average amount of lead absorbed by men is significantly greater than the average amount of lead absorbed by women.

2)The average amount of lead absorbed by men is significantly less than the average amount of lead absorbed by women.

3)We did not find enough evidence to say the average amount of lead absorbed by men is greater than the average amount of lead absorbed by women.

4)The average amount of lead absorbed by men is less than or equal to the average amount of lead absorbed by women.

5)The average amount of lead absorbed by men is significantly different from the average amount of lead absorbed by women
Mathematics
1 answer:
Eva8 [605]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Correct option is (A).

Step-by-step explanation:

A two-sample <em>t</em>-test can be performed to determine whether the amount of hazardous material absorbed by the bodies of hazardous waste workers depend on gender or not.

Th hypothesis will be:

<em>H₀</em>: The amount absorbed by men is same as the amount absorbed by women, i.e. <em>μ</em>₁ = <em>μ</em>₂.

<em>Hₐ</em>: The amount absorbed by men is greater than the amount absorbed by women, i.e. <em>μ</em>₁ > <em>μ</em>₂.

The test statistic used is:

t=\frac{\bar x_{1}-\bar x_{2}-(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})}{\sqrt{\frac{s_{1}^{2}}{n_{1}}+\frac{s_{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}}

The decision rule to reject the null hypothesis based on the <em>p</em>-value is:

If the <em>p</em>-value of the test is less than the significance level <em>α</em> then the null hypothesis will be rejected. And if the <em>p</em>-value of the test is greater than the significance level <em>α</em> then the null hypothesis will not be rejected.

The <em>p</em>-value of the test is,

<em>p </em>- value = 0.0032

The commonly used significance levels are:

<em>α</em> = 0.01, 0.05 and 0.10.

The <em>p</em>-value of this test is less than all these <em>α</em>'s.

Thus, the null hypothesis will be rejected.

<u>Conclusion:</u>

As the null hypothesis is rejected, it can be concluded that the amount of leas absorbed by men is significantly greater than the amount absorbed by women.

Thus, the correct option is (A).

You might be interested in
Why could it be dangerous to try to “keep up with the Jones” help me out plsss
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

The “Keeping up with the Joneses” syndrome can lead to obsessive spending behaviors that will create stress, worry, anxiety, and financial ruin. It can destroy the most ordinary individual you brush shoulders with or celebrities who eventually have to declare bankruptcy.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Which of the following situations could be modeled by an exponential function?
Sauron [17]

Answer: Option D.

Step-by-step explanation:

An exponential function is something like:

f(x) = A*(r)^x

Where:

A = initial amount.

r = rate of growth

x = variable.

This type of function is used to describe situations like "you have A dollars, and it increases by 30% each week"

or:

"There is a population of A animals, and it doubles each year"

Let's analyze briefly all the given options and see which one is an exponential function.

A) The water level of a tank decreases by 5 gallons every day.

This is a linear relation, if W is the initial amount of water, and x is the number of days, then the water level of the tank after x days is:

y = W - 5 gal*x

B) The amount of money collected by a charity increases by $5,000 each year.

The amount collected increases $5000 each year.

Then if in year 1 they collected A.

in year 2 they collected A + $5000

in year 3 they collected A + 2*$5000

We already can see the pattern, this is a linear relation:

in year X they colected A + (X - 1)*$5000

C) A tree was 10 feet tall when purchased and grows at a rate of 2 feet per year.

if y is the height of the tree, and x is the number of years, this can be written as:

y = 10ft + x*2ft

Again, a linear relation.

D) The number of people in a stadium is decreasing at a rate of 45% every 10 minutes.

Let's define x as each "lapse" of 10 minutes that passes.

If N is the initial number of people in te stadium, then after 10 minutes the number of people is = N*(1 - 45%/100%) = N*(1 - 0.45) = N*0.55

After another 10 minutes, the population decreases again.

N*0.55*(1 - 45%/100%) = N*0.55*0.55 = N*0.55^2

We can see the pattern here, this can be written as

People(x) = N*(0.55)^x

This is an exponential function.

3 0
2 years ago
Jason inherited a piece of land from his great-uncle. Owners in the area claim that there is a 45% chance that the land has oil.
Licemer1 [7]
So,

We are trying to find the compound probability of there BEING oil and the test predicting NO oil.

The percent chance of there actually being oil is 45%.  We can convert this into fraction form and simplify it.

45% --> \frac{45}{100}

\frac{45}{100}--\ \textgreater \  \frac{3*3*5}{2*2*5*5}

\frac{3*3*5}{2*2*5*5}--\ \textgreater \ \frac{3*3}{2*2*5}

\frac{3*3}{2*2*5}--\ \textgreater \  \frac{9}{20}

That is the simplified fraction form.

The kit has an 80% accuracy rate.  Since we are assuming that the land has oil, we need the probability that the kit predicts no oil.  

The probability that the kit detects no oil will be the chance that the kit is not accurate, which is 20% (100 - 80 = 20).  We can also convert this into fraction form and simplify it.

20% --> \frac{20}{100}

\frac{20}{100}--\ \textgreater \ \frac{2}{10}

\frac{2}{10}--\ \textgreater \ \frac{1}{5}

That is the probability of the kit not being accurate (not predicting any oil).

To find the compound probability of there being oil and the kit not predicting any oil, we simply multiply both fractions together.

\frac{9}{20}*\frac{1}{5}

\frac{9}{20*5}

\frac{9}{100}

So the probability of there BEING oil and the kit predicting NO oil is 9 in 100 chances.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Twice a number plus 6 is 20​
grigory [225]

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
a copy machine makes 60 copies per minute. a second copy makes 80 copies per minutes. the second machine starts making copies 2
wel
8minutes-2minutes=6minutes
6×80 copies = 480 copies
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe how you will subtract to find the difference of 604-357
    5·2 answers
  • What is 21-123+12*196
    10·1 answer
  • NEED HELP IM BEGGING YOU PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    9·2 answers
  • A woman making $32,000
    7·1 answer
  • HELPPPP PLEASE HELP ME WITH BASIC MATH I REALLY APPRECIATE IT ((WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST))​
    7·1 answer
  • How many grams are in 1 pound (on Earth)? Round to the nearest tenth.
    14·2 answers
  • Plz help meh......plz
    15·2 answers
  • Ted likes to run long distances. He can run 20 kilometers in 95 minutes. How far will Ted run in 285 minutes? (numeric only) *
    13·1 answer
  • Please help me solve
    5·2 answers
  • A number cube with faces labeled 1 to 6 is rolled once.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!