Neoclassical economics places a larger focus on providing extra options and <u>improving living standards, </u><u>which are ultimately decided by long-term progress.</u>
As a result, it focuses on long-term growth rather than fighting recessions.
In actuality, neoclassical economics holds that a product's price is mostly influenced by its manufacturing costs. According to neoclassical economics, the primary factor for client decision-making therefore becomes price.
As a result, letting the neoclassical economists concentrate on prices is not the best way to combat the recession. Long-term economic performance is always emphasized by neoclassical economists.
Note that the neoclassical approach to macroeconomics emphasizes the idea that, over time, the economy tends to recover to its potential GDP and natural unemployment rate.
Learn what John Maynard Keynes would recommend to fight the recession: brainly.com/question/25586856
#SPJ4
The appropriate labels for Curves N and M in the nearby graph is that the Curve N is total cost and Curve M is total variable cost.
<h3>Why is the curve as stated about?</h3>
Because a fixed cost is constant, this is not shown on the graph, however, the movement of the variable cost impacts directly on the total cost as well but it will be higher.
Hence, the appropriate labels for Curves N and M in the nearby graph is that the Curve N is total cost and Curve M is total variable cost.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about total cost
<em>brainly.com/question/5168855</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. is not liable because Mike was on a frolic of his own.
Explanation:
Mike who is a dispatch rider, decided to see his girlfriend, Jackie, who lived 50 miles off his pizza route. He had an accident while driving to his girlfriend's, and injured a pedestrian, Chuck due to his negligent driving.
Under the circumstances, Frank's Pizza isn't liable because Mike was on a frolic of his own. Mike embarking on a 50 mile drive to see his girlfriend is frolicsome and outside the scope of his employment as a delivery agent.
Hence, this will absolve his employer from any liability as he wasn't working on the designated route at the time.
Answer:
B. $600,000
Explanation:
The computation of the interest expense on the bond for the year 2012 is shown below:
= Interest expense as on 30 June 2012 + interest expense as on December 31 2012
= $300,000 + $300,000
= $600,000
For computing the interest expense for the year 2012, we added the interest expense of June 30 and for December 31 of 2012 only so that the correct amount could come
Answer:
Achieved. The ROI currently is 13.33% So the prohect earning a ROI of 12% was accomplished
Explanation:
Return on Investment will be Income/ Investment Capital
Which in this case is defined as total assets.
So it would be<em> Income / Total Assets</em>
The last is a given figure: 150,000
Now <u>let's first find out the income:</u>
180,000 revenues - 160,000 expenses = 20,000 net income
Finally <em>calculate the </em><em>ROI</em> 20,000/ 150,000 = 13.33%
