1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GREYUIT [131]
3 years ago
13

In the speech "communists in the state department," accusing people of being "card-carrying members of the communist party" impl

ies what? these people are not loyal to the united states. these people are guilty of treason. these people shouldn't be allowed to control our foreign policy. all of the above
History
2 answers:
Serjik [45]3 years ago
3 0
This is all if the above
Olenka [21]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is D) all of the above.

In the speech "communists in the state department," accusing people of being "card-carrying members of the communist party" implies that these people are not loyal to the united states, these people are guilty of treason, and these people shouldn't be allowed to control our foreign policy.

Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy accused many officials of the US government and members of the military of being Communists. Throughout the 1940s to the 1950s, McCarthy formulated this accusation during the so-called Second Red Scare. The problem was that the Senator just accused but never showed any valid proof. So he accused these people of treason but never showed any valid evidence, affecting the reputation of many people.

You might be interested in
What is an example of government influence on supply?
Paul [167]

Answer:

Government policies can affect the cost of production and the supply curve through taxes, regulations, and subsidies. For example, the U.S. government imposes a tax on alcoholic beverages that collects about $8 billion per year from producers.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Country Clues- Settlers from European Countries Questions
Westkost [7]
1a.................
2c...............
3a................
4d.............
5c............
6a...............
7a..............
8c..............

4 0
3 years ago
Why would parent allow their children to work in such dangerous conditions
lesantik [10]

Answer:

A parent would allow their child to work in dangerous conditions if they needed the child's payment money to help keep the family afloat and be able to provide for their families.

Explanation:

It makes sense because in third world countries companies such as Nike were using child labor to make their products and they only get payed about an $1 a day. In order to live adequately you need at least $3 a day, so they were using the kids to help with financial problems.

5 0
3 years ago
What was the outcome of the Worcester v. Georgia court case? A. The Cherokees won the right to stay on their land and were deeme
Evgen [1.6K]

Answer:  A. The Cherokees won the right to stay on their land and were deemed an independent nation.

<em>(That was a hollow victory though -- see last paragraph of explanation below.)</em>

<em />

Explanation:

The 1832 case, Worcester v. Georgia, ruled unconstitutional a Georgia law requiring non-Native Americans requiring a license from the state to be on Native American land.  In responding to the case, the Supreme Court asserted that the federal government is the sole authority to deal with a Native American nation.  From this Supreme Court assertion came the beginnings of tribal sovereignty within the United States for Native American nations -- that the US government would deal with them as domestic nations inside the United States.

The court case was named after Samuel Worcester, a Christian minister working among the Cherokee who was supportive of the Cherokee cause.  To block the activity of a man like Rev. Worcester, the state of Georgia passed a law prohibiting white persons to live within the Cherokee Nation territory without permission from the Georgia state government.  Worcester and other missionaries challenged this law, and the case rose to the level of a Supreme Court decision.  The decision by the Supreme Court, written by Chief Justice Marshall, struck down the Georgia law and reprimanded Georgia for interfering in the affairs of the Cherokee Nation.  Marshall wrote that Indian nations are "distinct, independent political communities retaining their original natural rights." 

But President Andrew Jackson chose not to enforce the court's decision.  He said at the time: "The decision of the Supreme Court has fell stillborn, and they find that it cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate."  He told the Cherokee that they would need to operate under the jurisdiction of the state of Georgia or else relocate.  This was a step in the direction of what became known as the "Trail of Tears," when the Cherokee were removed from Georgia and moved to territory in Oklahoma.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following pieces of evidence could be used to defend the statement, "If President Lincoln had lived, the Confederat
zhuklara [117]

Sorry im late for this one. If you still need this question, the answer you're looking for is  The Radical Republicans in the Senate opposed Lincoln’s Ten Percent Plan and demanded that Confederate states be punished for their rebellion against the Union.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Are poll taxes illegal under the bill of rights
    11·2 answers
  • What did the ancient greeks have a hardtime doing becuase there were few rivers?
    14·1 answer
  • What describes the abbasid muslim capital of baghdad in the years 762-1258?
    10·1 answer
  • List 2 powers not granted to the constitution
    13·2 answers
  • Why was the American colonization society founded
    6·1 answer
  • How did Mussolini, hilter,Franco Stalin gain the support of the citizens in their countries ?
    8·1 answer
  • All Native American tribes formed alliances with the French against the English.
    11·1 answer
  • Most of the goods produced in Japan are sent out of the country to be sold in global markets. This fact makes Japan which type o
    14·1 answer
  • How was world war 1 impact on russia similar to its impact on germany ?
    13·1 answer
  • Accenture is helping a client improve their business agility by reducing time to market, increasing product quality, and enablin
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!