Answer:
Explanation:
If I was Frank I wouldn’t have disclosed the information from one company to the next, it is unethical and with an NDA information shouldn’t be passed on. Even though, it may have been an opportunity for the company he got hired and a threat to the company he disclosed the information from.
Answer:
The statement is: False.
Explanation:
In supply chain management, incremental analysis is in charge of determining the cost of ordering one more additional unit of a product over the cost of no requesting that additional unit. The cost of overstimulating demand is the loss of ordering one additional unit and discovering that it cannot be sold. The cost of underestimating demand is the opportunity loss for nor requesting one additional and discovering it could have been sold.
<em>The cost of underestimating demand is more difficult to determine than the cost of overestimating demand because underestimating demand because it involves customer's desires</em> on purchasing a product when not having the resources to do so.
<span>Tony did not breach a contract because it was all up to Lorene and who she wanted to go with. Lorene is not obligated to go with either. Although Bill spent most of his allowance, he could still ask someone else, sell his ticket and or even go by himself. I do not think Tony could be held liable even if he knew. It was not a nice thing to flake on Bill, but ultimately, it was Lorene's decision to make.</span>
Solution:
Q MC FC VC TC AFC AVC ATC
0 NA 50 0 50 NA NA NA
1 50 50 50 105 50 50 105
2 19 50 64 104 20 32 52
3 85 40 149 189 13.33 49.67 63.00
4 223 40 372 412 10 93 103
TC=FC+VC
FC=40
VC=TC-FC
MC=change in TC
AFC=FC/Q
AVC=VC/0
ATC=TC/0
a) TC when 0=0 = 40 because FC = 40 remains constant and the firm still incurs a total cost equal to its FC when it produces zero output.
b) MC for first unit = 45
c) ATC of 3rd unit = 63
d) AVC for 4th unit = 93
