Answer:
The answer is: There was no consumer surplus in this situation.
Explanation:
consumer surplus refers to the difference between the maximum amount a consumer is willing to pay for a good or service and the actual price of the good or service.
In this case there was no consumer surplus, since Stacey was willing to pay only $2 for a bottle of mineral water and its price was $2.25, so she didn't buy it.
Answer:
b)
Explanation:
b- as soon and you have the money ~ so that let's say for example you want a phone and the phone is 300 dollars and you get 15 dollars/ an hour you would save up to get it
Answer:
Yes, the company is liable because Jamal was on his work route and took a minor detour to pick shirts he needed for work.
Explanation:
Generally what determines if the company is liable or not for a car accident, is if the employee was acting within the scope of his/her normal employment activities. In this case, even though Jamal took a break to pick up some shirts for work, he didn't deviate form his normal activities and not even from his normal work route. He was actually coming back from making a delivery.
It would have been different if he had gone to a different neighborhood or downtown just to pick the shirts. You must also consider that Jamal drives the delivery truck 10 hours a day, and that doesn't leave him a lot of spare time for his own personal activities, and this particular one was also related to his work.
This situation is similar to an accident happening when a truck driver is stopping to go to the bathroom or eating something while travelling.
Take-home pay is calculated through individual's monthly gross income and subtracting federal tax, government, health and other contributions.
Consumer credit can be goods, money or services provided to a consumer instead of a payment and an example are credit cards and personal loans.
As a percent of take-home pay, monthly consumer credit payment should not exceed to 20%.