Answer:Lack of Feasibility studies
Explanation:
He might experience obstacle if he choose not to understand the area and its demand by the people around the selected area.
Secondly is lack of capital to start up the business.
Answer:
The answer is: A) $0
Explanation:
I am assuming Stuart's stock is part of his retirement account. If this is true, then the stock dividends and stock splits are not taxed as they are earned (but they will be taxed later when Stuart starts receiving his distributions).
If Stuart's stock was not part of his retirement account, then he would have to pay taxes (usually a 15% tax rate applies).
Answer:
20 more tons of pollution into the air, and Firm B will emit 100 fewer tons of pollution into the air.
Explanation:
It is given that :
Amount of tons of pollutants emitted by the two firms A and B earlier = 100 tons
Cost of pollutants by firm A = $ 200 per ton of pollutions
Cost of pollutants by firm B = $ 100 per ton of pollutions
Since the cost for eliminating the pollutants into the air is more for the firm A, the ticket is also more valuable for firm A. And therefore, firm A will buy all the tickets form firm B for an amount around $ 101 to $ 199. It will do so as to have a positive consumer and also to produce surplus.
So firm A will eliminate 20 tons of pollution and will use 80 ton capacity from the tickets. And for firm B, it will eliminate all 100 tons of pollutions.
Answer: C the fallacy of composition.
Explanation:
The Fallacy of Composition is meant to explain the false logic that people apply when they believe that because something is true of a subsection of something, then that thing must be true for the whole thing.
For instance, my phone's batter is made of lithium so my entire phone must be made of lithium.
In this scenario, the logic is that it is good to be involved in military conflict because it favors the nation if it favors a subset (employees in defense) which is flawed because other industries might suffer. This however, represents the fallacy of composition.
Answer:
25%
Explanation:
the formula for the margin of safety is as follows
margin = current sales level -breakeven point/ current sales level x 100
expected sales unit = 20,000 units
the break-even point is fixed costs/contribution margin
fixed costs= $360,000
contribution margin = sales price- variable costs
=61-37
=24
breakeven point = $360,000/ 24
=15000
the margin of safety = 20,000-15,000/20,000 x 100
=5000/20000 x 100
=25%
