Answer:
Paul is NOT maximizing his utility.
Explanation:
Given:
MU
= Marginal utility from DVDs = 21
MU
= Marginal utility from books = 4
P = Price of DVDS = $11
P = Price of books = $1
Under the utility maximization theory for two or more goods, utility is said to be maximized by a consumer when the ratios of the marginal utility to price per unit of each good are equal to each other. For this question, this implies that when we have:
MU / P = MU / P ………………………….. (1)
Therefore, we have:
MU / P = 21 / 11 = 1.91
MU / P = 4 / 1 = 4
Since 1.91 = MU / P < MU / P = 4, this implies that these conditions are NOT consistent with equation (1). Therefore, Paul is NOT maximizing his utility.
In order to maximize his utility, Paul should consume more DVDs and consume less books until these conditions are consistent with equation (1).
In a country with a high uncertainty avoidance majority of people have an increased level of anxiety about uncertainty and ambiguity
There are different kinds of cases. The answers to the questions are blow.
- Before any court can hear any dispute between Miriam and the trucking company, it must have the jurisdiction to do so.
- In order for Marya to sue the trucking firm, she has to file the lawsuit in a court that also has personal jurisdiction over the <u>Defendant</u>.
- Georgia and Florida have personal jurisdiction over the trucking firm?
Yes, Marya sue the trucking firm in Georgia and Florida state courts.
Miriam would likely NOT want to sue the trucking firm in Georgia because she would need to;
- Get a lawyer in Georgia
- Make multiple trips to Georgia
- Have witnesses travel to Georgia.
Miriam would likely want to sue the trucking firm in Florida because:
1. The court is closer to her home
2. She can better research for local lawyers
- Miriam can sue the trucking firm in a federal trial court because residents of different states.
<h3>What takes place in a court case?</h3>
In a trial done in a court, lawyers often present evidence via witnesses who are known to testify about what they have seen or known.
After all the evidence had been presented, the lawyers will then give their closing arguments and lastly, the jury then decides if the defendant is guilty or not guilty.
Learn more about jurisdiction from
brainly.com/question/681072
The closest to the minimum number of consumers needed to obtain the estimate with the desired precision is (b) 271
Explanation:
When the prior estimate of population proportion is not given , then the formula to find the sample size is given by :-
where E = Margin of error.
z* = Critical z-value.
As per given , we have
E = 5%=0.05
Confidence level = 90%
The critical value of z at 90% is 1.645 (By z-table)
Put all values in the formula , we get
n=0.25(1.645/0.05)²
n=0.25(32.9)²
n=270.6025≈271
Thus, the minimum sample size needed = 271
Hence , the correct answer is 271 .
Answer: Wages account debit
Wages payable account credit
Explanation:
Sdjusting entries are simply referred to as the journal entries that are made when the accounting period ends such that there is allocation of the income and the expenditure incurred by the economic agent to the period in which the income and the expenditure occurred.
In this case, the adjusting journal entry passed by the accountant will be to debit the wages account by $1500 and then credit the wages payable account by $1500.
