On the balance sheet after adjusting entries are made, the amount shown for the allowance for doubtful accounts is equal to the total estimated uncollectible accounts as the end of the year. A doubtful account is a reduction of the total amount of acounts receivable appearing on a company's balance sheet and are listed as a deduction immediately below accounts receivable line item.
Answer:
$58,200.
Explanation:
We use the inventory identity to solve for COGS
Beginning Inventory 27,300
Production 57,500
Ending 26,600
27,300 + 57,500 = 26,600 + COGS
COGS = 27,300 + 57,500 - 26,600
COGS = 58,200
Answer:
The cost recovery deduction for 2019 is $26666
Explanation:
Additional first-year depreciation = 40000*0.5
= $20000
MACRS cost recovery = (40000 - 20000)*0.3333
= $6666
Total cost recovery deduction for 2017 = Additional first-year depreciation + MACRS cost recovery
= $20000 + $6666
= $26666
Therefore, The cost recovery deduction for 2019 is $26666
Answer:
To create the collar, the customer would: <u>buy 1 PHLX 59 SF Call and sell 1 PHLX 61 SF Call.</u>
Explanation:
The meaning of a "collar" is that a put is bought at a strike price that is less than the price of the underlying instrument (this implies that a floor has been put on the price of the instrument); and that a call is disposed at a strike price which is higher than the price of the underlying instrument (this indicates that a ceiling above which the instrument will be called away has been created).
When a collar is put on the price, it indicates that the customer is majorly giving a guarantee for the underlying instrument's minimum and maximum price.
This should make the net cost of the collar to be close to zero due to the fact that the two contracts are "out the money" and also because the premium paid to buy the put is offset by the premium received when the call was sold.
Therefore, since customer in the question wishes to place a collar on the position using PHLX SF FLEX options, he would <u>buy 1 PHLX 59 SF Call and sell 1 PHLX 61 SF Call</u> to create the collar.
Answer:
pricing low
yes
Explanation:
Game theory looks at the interactions between participants in a competitive game and calculates the best choice for the player.
Dominant strategy is the best option for a player regardless of what the other player is playing.
Nash equilibrium is the best outcome for players where no player has an incentive to change their decisions.
if either firm charges high, they either earn 11 million or 2 million.
if either firm charges low, it would earn either 15 million or 8 million.
because the payoffs of charging low is higher than the payoffs of charging high, the best strategy is for the firms to charge low if there is no cooperation.
the game is a prisoners dilemma because the choice the firms make isn't the choice that will yield the highest payoffs. the choice that would yield the highest payoffs is to both charge high prices.
